Simpleton
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 20,987
The defense definitely does.this team also seems to do better when people aren’t praising them. They might need the us against the world.
The defense definitely does.this team also seems to do better when people aren’t praising them. They might need the us against the world.
As shitty as they looked yesterday, why not?Sign Rolando!![]()
It meant nothing to the Giants and they basically decided to go out and play for the hell of it because of the circumstances, that one performance doesn't outweigh the fact that we killed them twice and they lost several other embarrassing games.
If the Eagles had beaten us twice this year, convincingly, and the rest of the season went like it did (Arizona loss, yesterday's blowout), would you feel really swell if we played the 49ers close at home in the season finale (but lost) in a game that made no difference to us?
I seriously doubt it.
What? So we lose Hankins and its okeedokee fine if Parsons cant or wont play the run?
Yep. Not a lot of pressure at all last night, and it really didn’t matter since you had one damn guy put up over 200 yards of offense on the ground by himself. And, this isn’t an anomaly- it’s happened numerous times when we needed a game or were in a playoff game.He didn't exactly distinguish himself today. Sometimes it feels like if he doesn't get to the QB, no one does. Fowler and Armstrong are repeating their late season swoon from last year, and DLaw is a run stopper only at this point.
It just feels like a whole lot hindsight right now, nobody at the time thought "hey, wow this might be the NFC favorite" because they lost a close one in that game.No but the point is the Giants showed signs that they could be extremely competitive against one of the best teams of all time.
Surely you are aware of our recent history.
He needs to bring something else when teams decide to run the ball 49 times . Yes, 49 runs .No but I think it's obvious what his main job is.
Yea Mazi was only so so but he wasn't at fault for most of the big runs, most of them were to the perimeter or cut backs where he held the POA but the LB's or ends weren't able to wrap around or hold the backside to clean up.
I don't think Hankins being around to play 40% of the snaps would've made much difference, the entire defense was discombobulated and running around like idiots against the run, overrunning their gaps, opening up big cut back lanes and so forth. It looked exactly like the Arizona game earlier in the year honestly.
Exactly.If you see the other team rushing to the line and haven't seen the replay but it's the first half, challenge anyway or at least burn a timeout. Timeouts are rarely important in the first half but a turnover or even an incomplete pass sure as hell could be.
The Ernster has spoken. Case closed!
Nor to the Giants.It wasn't meaningless at all to the Patriots.
Sure, that was my flippant way of saying I don't think Hankins would've made any difference yesterday.I don't think you can reduce it to Hankins only playing 40% of the snaps, because if they are shutting down the run and forcing them to pass the ball, he's not needed for those other 60% of snaps anyway.
The one thing we have to do in the playoffs is come out like the Bills did yesterday. They were physical right from the get go. You have to play like that. They almost took Dak out twice and if they did they would've been fine with the penalty. There's a time for that shit and we always pick the wrong time.Yea, I mean I keep going back to last year's playoffs, everyone rightly expected SF to completely overrun our defense because we had several games similar to the one yesterday where the run defense got abused up and down the field.
Then we get into the playoffs and the defense plays lights out in both games, including against SF at full strength on the road.
For whatever reason it seems that Quinn and the defense are prone to these sorts of shit performances a few times a year and then once they get humbled and right their heads they respond well.