- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,268
Oh yeah, well my dad can kick your dads ass.Whatever Mr. "No Mahomes on it".
I doubt Mahomes even made a Big 12 All-Conference team.
Oh yeah, well my dad can kick your dads ass.Whatever Mr. "No Mahomes on it".
I doubt Mahomes even made a Big 12 All-Conference team.
Yeah I mean stud NFL player but playing for Tech really dragged him down. Baker at least had the good sense to get out...Whatever Mr. "No Mahomes on it".
I doubt Mahomes even made a Big 12 All-Conference team.
If I had a scathing gif, I would totally drop it on you right now!Yeah I mean stud NFL player but playing for Tech really dragged him down. Baker at least had the good sense to get out...
There is a common thread with most on this list. They were good running QB s for the most part and it was this quality that made them stand out at the college level.
There is so much wrong with this list.
With USC/UCLA heading to Big 10 next year. The PAC is in trouble. Could very soon see Oregon and Washington looking their as well. If Colorado makes the jump to the Big 12. It may hasten the collapse.
PAC 12 & ACC might as well look into some type of merger. There have been a lot of rumors about teams jumping ship from the ACC as well. A PAC 12/ACC merger might stop the bleeding.With USC/UCLA heading to Big 10 next year. The PAC is in trouble. Could very soon see Oregon and Washington looking their as well. If Colorado makes the jump to the Big 12. It may hasten the collapse.
I don't understand why these boosters are eagerly handing out 6 & 7 figure NIL deals to unproven 18 year-olds. There are hundreds of 5-star "can't miss" prospects who turn out to be busts once they get to college.So I guess he got in trouble for saying NIL isn't all peaches and roses (as Quincy once said)?
Well no kidding. Geez, the Twitter experts jump on anyone for anything,
From reading various boards, there's a whole movement of people, usually younger kids, who are more interested in these poor oppressed athletes -- who even before got scholarships worth 100k, tutors, the best dorms and food, campus fame, and of course all the parties and girls -- getting paid every cent possible than they are about the actual sport. They're more into the politics of it than the game. I don't understand it.Just because something is good for the athlete doesn't mean it's good for the sport.
There's got to be a common sense middle ground. I'm all for the players being compensated but it needs to be regulated much better.From reading various boards, there's a whole movement of people, usually younger kids, who are more interested in these poor oppressed athletes -- who even before got scholarships worth 100k, tutors, the best dorms and food, campus fame, and of course all the parties and girls -- getting paid every cent possible than they are about the actual sport. They're more into the politics of it than the game. I don't understand it.
It still saddens me to see how Miami can have all of these classes and no results.So I guess Alabama is the odds on favorite to win this year.
I'm surprised Georgia has fallen off this much in regards to blue chip ratio. Oklahoma is actually closer to them than they are to Alabama.
They haven't been able to figure out the QB position. If there's not a blue chip QB in place, the blue chip WRs and TEs usually look elsewhere.It still saddens me to see how Miami can have all of these classes and no results.
I wonder which schools stop recruiting a player if they think the player is only about money.From reading various boards, there's a whole movement of people, usually younger kids, who are more interested in these poor oppressed athletes -- who even before got scholarships worth 100k, tutors, the best dorms and food, campus fame, and of course all the parties and girls -- getting paid every cent possible than they are about the actual sport. They're more into the politics of it than the game. I don't understand it.