2023 NFL Draft Chatter Thread...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,428
I high one sits the longest? Mauch or Eongo would be my bet.

Side not Mauch is the new babyeater
Are the slash guys sitting together or something? I get Jones and Smith but Van Ness and Murphy is an odd pairing then.

Also virtual invite? So they will have a camera in there house? Meh
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
17,595
For the people opposed to Mayer, if the evaluation is that he is likely to be a Mark Andrews-level player, is that enough to warrant taking him in the first?

Yes or no question, I don't care about him running a tenth of a second slower in the 40 or whatever.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,801
For the people opposed to Mayer, if the evaluation is that he is likely to be a Mark Andrews-level player, is that enough to warrant taking him in the first?

Yes or no question, I don't care about him running a tenth of a second slower in the 40 or whatever.
Yes. Major win there if he is Mark Andrews.
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,428
I'm not sure why Stroud is being targeted for example.

On the other hand I know S2 wants this stuff confidential. For obvious reasons too, if Stroud ends up a stud they don't want his score being out there showing the system is flawed.
 
Last edited:

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,428
Because there's a huge drop off from him and Young to the other two so I think teams want him to drop, assuming Young goes 1.
That would make sense. Certainly seems like a bunch of negative stuff at Stroud all of a sudden a week before the draft. Doesn't impact us but it is interesting.
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,904

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
53,428
If Stroud drops to Dallas cuz he's half a retard ,do you take him?
Yes, worth the risk because the upside is too good. If he is what I think he could be you get a rookie contract QB for 5 years and get out of the 50 mil QB business.
 

Rev

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
19,801
Yes, worth the risk because the upside is too good. If he is what I think he could be you get a rookie contract QB for 5 years and get out of the 50 mil QB business.
5 years from now it wont be 50 mill. We will be in the 60s.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,928
5 years from now it wont be 50 mill. We will be in the 60s.
At this point how much a QB earns will continue to rise.

Perhaps in the next CBA something will change, but this is what it is.

I don't give a shit about the QB. Every team will have a sunk cost by the time any QB worth a shit hits their second contract.

I am talking about the dumb sizeable investments on non-essential positions, which means anything other than a QB, LT or Edge.
 

boozeman

28 Years And Counting...
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
123,928
I assume that means Arizona would want to take an OT after a trade down, not that a team wants to move up to 3 to take an OT, which would be insane.
I can’t think of any of them as anywhere near the top 10.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom