2026 NFL Draft Chatter

Simpleton said:
I was being realistic on WR/TE, if a clear round 2 type guy is there you have to consider him. I'd include Fields and a few others at WR, maybe Stowers at TE.

But realistically I think it's extremely unlikely that there will be a WR or TE I'll want to take at 92.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's where I'm at. I know there will be third round graded players available on defense at 92. I don't view WR as a need because I'm actually a Flournoy fan (I actually called it before last season) and Pickens, Lamb and Flournoy might be the best WR trio in the NFL in my humble opinion. But the truth is in the NFL a position of strength can turn into a position of weakness in the blink of an eye.

RB I guess is still sort of a sneaky need. We don't know who RB2 is. I still think Blue and Mafah will step up. But if a starting caliber RB falls in my lap at 92 I won't turn my nose up at it. Jevonte has a history with injuries. And RB's take a beating. So of course having a young option is never a bad idea if the value makes it worth it. Again, I bring up Emmett Johnson because he is like a late second round RB to me. And I could see him falling because it's RB and I'm not sure the "experts" all agree he should be that high.

But I still think I can potentially get a starting safety/LBer at pick 92. I can get someone who might not start but will play a heavy amount of snaps at OLBer/D-line at pick 92. And that's absolutely where I'd prefer to go.
 
Genghis Khan said:
I think OT, TE, RB, and WR should all be on the table. But only round 5 or later, and even then I'd want to have addressed all of the defense first.
Click to expand...

He said skill position, given that we have a certified moron starting at LT and a lesbian at RT I'd very much consider a OT at 92, if not higher if we traded down in the first.
 
Simpleton said:
He said skill position, given that we have a certified moron starting at LT and a lesbian at RT I'd very much consider a OT at 92, if not higher if we traded down in the first.
Click to expand...


I did miss that he said skill position, but the only way I'd consider offense that high is if we add several additional picks after trade downs.
 
Simpleton said:
He said skill position, given that we have a certified moron starting at LT and a lesbian at RT I'd very much consider a OT at 92, if not higher if we traded down in the first.
Click to expand...

Not a lesbian, just a man with bigger tits than most females.
 
Carp said:
What offensive skill position would you want the Cowboys to spend a pick on…WR, TE, RB?
Click to expand...

TE if his name is Kenyon Sadiq. Im probably the only one here that is close enough to wanting to draft him in the first round over some of the defensive guys.

Other than that probably RB because I think we need a second one.
 
Genghis Khan said:
I did miss that he said skill position, but the only way I'd consider offense that high is if we add several additional picks after trade downs.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's hard when you only have 3 picks on day one and day two and a defense that was as bad as ours. If you were able to have 4 or 5 picks in the first two days, that opens things up dramatically in my opinion. But that may require a trade down or two.
 
I said skill position and didn’t designate a round you dumb bitches. 😂

Anyhoo…yeah, definitely would draft a RB.
 
Ok fine. Skill position…

Give me a first round trade down, pick up a third and take WR Bryce Lance.


You can thank me when he’s holding up that Super Bowl MVP trophy in a couple years.
 
And from that same article...

"Who isn't a consensus top-10 pick right now but could end up there by draft time?

Yates: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama. Consensus is not easy to find right now, but one name that I haven't seen linked to the top 10 as often is Proctor. He has incredible traits, led by his mammoth size at 6-foot-7 and 352 pounds with nifty athleticism. He could be in play for the Browns at No. 6 and the Chiefs at No. 9.

Miller: Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia. He might rise into the top 10 based on positional value and need. The 6-foot-7, 315-pounder was just a one-year starter, but his athletic tools are that of a high-end NFL starter on the left side. Like Proctor, the Browns or Chiefs could take a chance on Freeling.

Reid: Keldric Faulk, DL, Auburn. He fits the exact archetype that teams covet near the top of the draft. At 6-foot-5, 276 pounds, Faulk's pass-rush production took a step back in 2025, but he's only 21 and one of the best run defenders in the class. When speaking to scouts, Greg Rousseau and Mykel Williams are two NFL comparisons for him. The Chiefs at No. 9 and the Bengals at No. 10 overall are two teams to watch here."

I'd be fucking stoked if just one of them went top 10, which would most likely mean that either Bain, Delane, Styles or Downs will have dropped to 12.
 
So, you guys have been talking about Faulk a lot so I finally went and watched him myself. I wasn't all that impressed. He seems slow off the ball. He also is not very athletic at all. His lateral movement was almost awkward looking. He seems to be a great run defender but looks more like an average pass rusher. I think I would take Methusidor and Parker over him. I'm not sure I would even be interested in him at 20, tbh.
 
Cotton said:
So, you guys have been talking about Faulk a lot so I finally went and watched him myself. I wasn't all that impressed. He seems slow off the ball. He also is not very athletic at all. His lateral movement was almost awkward looking. He seems to be a great run defender but looks more like an average pass rusher. I think I would take Methusidor and Parker over him. I'm not sure I would even be interested in him at 20, tbh.
Click to expand...

So what I am hearing you say is that you are a fan of him being pick 12.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom