- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 122,861
Fuck Jason Garrett.Surprise. The gingerbot looks just as lost there as he did on the sidelines.
I am more unnerved by Spaulding blankly staring into space, plotting his future.
Fuck Jason Garrett.Surprise. The gingerbot looks just as lost there as he did on the sidelines.
I would not weep for anyone in that photoFuck Jason Garrett.
I am more unnerved by Spaulding blankly staring into space, plotting his future.
Yeah but some of you degenerates would pork the one in the middle.I would not weep for anyone in that photo
Yeah but some of you degenerates would pork the one in the middle.
I refuse to be lumped in with those degeneratesYeah but some of you degenerates would pork the one in the middle.
Your vote has been tallied, citizen.I refuse to be lumped in with those degenerates
Nine years ago.
And look at Spaulding. Patient, but plotting.Jerry looks awful in that photo, like a man who wouldn't have made it another 9 years.
"Soon"And look at Spaulding. Patient, but plotting.
Should be a bannable offense.Nine years ago.
Not really although it's hard to see them taking Gibbs since he's so similar to Pollard.Anyone care what Sturm thinks? I don't remember seeing a lot of his Athletic stuff on here this year.
Anyway, he thinks you need a playmaker at 26. He would skew his board to offense to get a guy who can make big plays, whether that's TE, WR, or RB. He's on the C-Rock side of Mayer in that he worried he's too pedestrian athletically to be a big playmaker in the pros. Loves Bijan Robinson. (I still don't get talking about this guy like he's Adrian Peterson or Barry Sanders.) Bob wouldn't take a defensive guy unless things break that way and the player is simply too good to pass up. Would be okay with taking Gibbs.
Bob loves Bryce Young and says he reminds him of Mahomes. (LOLOLOL)
I wouldn't be especially happy if they took someone like Hyatt over McDonald.
He did say edge rusher was one position that was maybe so valuable you take a guy there. Or a DT who is so good he's a starter from his first practice. But he'd still lean heavily to offense.Not really although it's hard to see them taking Gibbs since he's so similar to Pollard.
I'm also not sure how wise it is to hone in on "playmaker" as a need that you take come hell or high water at the end of the first, like I wouldn't be especially happy if they took someone like Hyatt over McDonald.
Yeah I mean if you go back to the way our season ended I get the thought that you need a play maker. We literally just ran out of play makers against the 49ers. Once Pollard went down it was Lamb and no one else really. We couldn't do anything at that point.Not really although it's hard to see them taking Gibbs since he's so similar to Pollard.
I'm also not sure how wise it is to hone in on "playmaker" as a need that you take come hell or high water at the end of the first, like I wouldn't be especially happy if they took someone like Hyatt over McDonald.
I think Sturm now is beneath Brugler at Athletic. As he should be IMO.Anyone care what Sturm thinks? I don't remember seeing a lot of his Athletic stuff on here this year.
Anyway, he thinks you need a playmaker at 26. He would skew his board to offense to get a guy who can make big plays, whether that's TE, WR, or RB. He's on the C-Rock side of Mayer in that he worried he's too pedestrian athletically to be a big playmaker in the pros. Loves Bijan Robinson. (I still don't get talking about this guy like he's Adrian Peterson or Barry Sanders.) Bob wouldn't take a defensive guy unless things break that way and the player is simply too good to pass up. Would be okay with taking Gibbs.
Bob loves Bryce Young and says he reminds him of Mahomes. (LOLOLOL)
Why the desire to force the TE pick? It makes no sense.
Classic pre-draft misdirection. I hope.Why the desire to force the TE pick? It makes no sense.