- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 62,464
No, because pressure stats unlike those associated with other positions tend to be subjective and often flat out stupid.
Most of what they do is subjective. Sort of like pass rush win rate which is different than pressures. Guy beats his man cleanly but the QB gets the ball off before it's physically possible to get to him, is that the rushers fault? Or is that the coverage? But I do know EZ had a good amount of splash plays. The sack numbers weren't there but our secondary was utter shit which didn't help. But oddly enough I think he graded really well against the run where more of his splash plays came from. Kind of funny considering that was the real concern with EZ.
But that same subjectivity is a flaw in almost everything PFF does. They don't really evaluate the coverages. They just see a ball caught or not caught and assign responsibility to the closest guy. There was so much confusion in our secondary that often times I think guys were getting blamed for trying to cover things that other players blew.
Anyway, was just curious your thoughts. Sometimes I'm interested what PFF has to say. But I've always thought their grades come out very wonky at times.