2026 Cowboys Free Agency Thread…

No, because pressure stats unlike those associated with other positions tend to be subjective and often flat out stupid.

Most of what they do is subjective. Sort of like pass rush win rate which is different than pressures. Guy beats his man cleanly but the QB gets the ball off before it's physically possible to get to him, is that the rushers fault? Or is that the coverage? But I do know EZ had a good amount of splash plays. The sack numbers weren't there but our secondary was utter shit which didn't help. But oddly enough I think he graded really well against the run where more of his splash plays came from. Kind of funny considering that was the real concern with EZ.

But that same subjectivity is a flaw in almost everything PFF does. They don't really evaluate the coverages. They just see a ball caught or not caught and assign responsibility to the closest guy. There was so much confusion in our secondary that often times I think guys were getting blamed for trying to cover things that other players blew.

Anyway, was just curious your thoughts. Sometimes I'm interested what PFF has to say. But I've always thought their grades come out very wonky at times.
 
Just not concluding he was the worst CB in the NFL last year.


I don't believe that either, I definitely don't trust these subjective rankings. He wasn't even the worst CB on the team (Diggs).

But if he wasn't the worst he wasn't far off.

Now, could he improve? Sure.
 
Luckily now with Durant we hopefully won't have to count on Revel.

We don't have to, but obviously in an ideal world Durant gets to be the third corner. It's nice to have an option in a guy who can also be a #2 corner though. Especially when you keep in mind that Bland had foot surgery again. It also helps that I think Thompson can play the slot and so if we had to shift Thompson to the slot in the nickel and play Durant outside we are still good.

I'd still draft a corner in the first if the right value is there. But it's nice to be in a position where we don't have to. And maybe you don't even have to worry about Thompson playing the slot and he can line up more as a traditional safety.
 
Most of what they do is subjective. Sort of like pass rush win rate which is different than pressures. Guy beats his man cleanly but the QB gets the ball off before it's physically possible to get to him, is that the rushers fault? Or is that the coverage? But I do know EZ had a good amount of splash plays. The sack numbers weren't there but our secondary was utter shit which didn't help. But oddly enough I think he graded really well against the run where more of his splash plays came from. Kind of funny considering that was the real concern with EZ.

But that same subjectivity is a flaw in almost everything PFF does. They don't really evaluate the coverages. They just see a ball caught or not caught and assign responsibility to the closest guy. There was so much confusion in our secondary that often times I think guys were getting blamed for trying to cover things that other players blew.

Anyway, was just curious your thoughts. Sometimes I'm interested what PFF has to say. But I've always thought their grades come out very wonky at times.
I like that word... wonky. We need to make a concentrated effort to bring it into normal daily use.
 
I don't believe that either, I definitely don't trust these subjective rankings. He wasn't even the worst CB on the team (Diggs).

But if he wasn't the worst he wasn't far off.

Now, could he improve? Sure.

Diggs had like a perfect passer rating against him last year. It was ugly for basically all our corners. And it was weird too. They would have a good game or two and then be pathetic the next game. I feel like Carson even looked good for a couple of games and then absolute garbage. Bland definitely had some ups and downs like that as well.

Diggs is the only guy that I'm not sure he ever looked good. I can't recall ever thinking after a game last year, well Diggs looked like his old self. It was all just bad.
 
Anyway, was just curious your thoughts. Sometimes I'm interested what PFF has to say. But I've always thought their grades come out very wonky at times.
Very wonky, but last place is last place. Even if they are off by a lot, it’s damning.

What I dislike most is how people take to them because literally no one else does it.
 
Last edited:
My second favorite LBer in this draft is Jacob Rodriguez. Next favorite might be Golday. After that I've probably got CJ Allen, Hill and then Trotter.

And there are a bunch more guys outside of that who I really like. Some are undersized like Kyle Lewis or Harold Perkins. Down to my sleeper which is Karson Sharar from Iowa. Killer instincts, from a defense that produces LBers and oh hey he ran an excellent 4.56 forty and jumped a 40 inch vertical. I say sleeper but he is Kipers 10th rated LBer. Not sure if that quantifies as a sleeper.
Lookit…Hot Rod is at the top of the booze Board’s most likely to be available to reach for. I wikey the player a lawt to the point I could talk myself into the first round.

And I saw what you did, Hawkeye homer.
 
Watched some Durant all-22 (Philly, Detroit, both Seattle regular season games, Chicago and Seattle in the playoffs) and he's basically as advertised, a good, solid starter, but obviously not elite.

Long story short: Very good zone feel and plays with good leverage knowing where his help is, good ball skills, reliable open field tackler, lacks elite twitch and size and can get boxed out against bigger bodies. Very comfortable with him as a CB3, can probably function well enough as a CB2 but will give up some plays against better competition (and will make his fair share too).

Short story long: Because he's not elite he'll give up some plays to elite WR's (Brown, Smith-Njigba, etc.) but what I noticed is that he very rarely gets beat by secondary type weapons like Kupp, Shaheed and Odunze. He's small so he can get boxed out at times in tight quarters by bigger bodies, but the times I saw it felt flukey (like the ridiculous 4th down TD to Kmet against Chicago that tied the game that should've been offensive PI).

Aside from that nonsense 4th down play his performance against Chicago was probably one of the best individual performances you'll see out of a CB. Multiple PD's, including one at the goal-line to save a TD, 2 picks with nearly a 3rd, and really good open field tackling.

I can see why the Rams did what they did at CB though because their entire secondary had a rough NFCC and were arguably the reason they lost the game. With that said, they locked up Seattle's passing game pretty good the first two times, and sometimes it just goes against you, especially playing a division opponent for a 3rd time. In the two regular season games Darnold was 51/78 for 549 yards (7 YPA) for 2 TD's and 6 INT's, their defense pretty significantly outplayed the Seattle offense across 8 quarters in the regular season (until the extremely flukey last 10 minutes or so of the second game) and I think it was probably a matter of Seattle's offense finally figuring out how to attack them schematically after getting knocked around for two games.

I think they could've easily won it all with a guy like Durant starting but they wanted to aggressively go for it before Stafford falls off a cliff and CB was really the only position that lacked top end talent. They're returning basically every starter on both sides of the ball, with an elite WR duo, a very good RB, one of the better OL's in the league that has played together for a while now, and one of the better front 7's in the league. The only spot where they were kind of just getting by was at CB, so that's where they went all in going into possibly Stafford's last year.
 
Long story short: Very good zone feel and plays with good leverage knowing where his help is, good ball skills, reliable open field tackler

This is exactly the type of player we didn't have in the secondary last year. Whether it was coaching or the players or both, when we got beat in coverage it looked like no one knew what they were doing. The ability to understand man and zone leverage is so important in "modern" defenses.
 
Back
Top Bottom