2026 Cowboys Draft Chatter Thread

Funny, was just listening to one of the 105.3 podcasts and Broaddus (small Siberian salt mine) is talking about this like everyone knows Bain has something wrong that people know about.

Also says people tell him they're interested in going to 6 but not 3. They could be afraid all the defensive guys are gone. Thinks Miami could trade out for picks because people know Dallas has to take defense.

Also says he thinks if stuck at 12 we'd take Mesidor.

But if Dallas were comfortable with "the Bain situation", they could just take him.

Thinks even Faulk or Woods could be in play, that real scouts like them more than media scouts. But probable Mesidor.

Also says Bob McGinn is a "terrible human being" because he posted the bad Wonderlic scores of prospects. Damn, toughen up, buttercup.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Funny, was just listening to one of the 105.3 podcasts and Broaddus (small Siberian salt mine) is talking about this like everyone knows Bain has something wrong that people know about.

Also says people tell him they're interested in going to 6 but not 3. They could be afraid all the defensive guys are gone. Thinks Miami could trade out for picks because people know Dallas has to take defense.

Also says he thinks if stuck at 12 we'd take Mesidor.

But if Dallas were comfortable with "the Bain situation", they could just take him.

Thinks even Faulk or Woods could be in play, that real scouts like them more than media scouts. But probable Mesidor.

Also says Bob McGinn is a "terrible human being" because he posted the bad Wonderlic scores of prospects. Damn, toughen up, buttercup.
Click to expand...

I think trading up to 6 makes much more sense than 3 because there's no way you can go from 12 to 3 for just 92.

I could see it at 6 and if Reese or Bailey somehow drop there, I think you might see it. I'd also advocate for a small trade up to 9 or 10 if the board is thinning for Downs or Styles.

Mesidor and that group would make sense as a fallback at 12, but if it were me it'd be Thieneman.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Also says Bob McGinn is a "terrible human being" because he posted the bad Wonderlic scores of prospects. Damn, toughen up, buttercup.
Click to expand...


Why would we have have them take the Wonderlic and not reveal the scores?
 
Cujo said:
Why would we have have them take the Wonderlic and not reveal the scores?
Click to expand...
Apparently because it's too mean if they don't do well. Even though it's well known that people who bomb the test usually don't do well in the league.

No wonder Parcells fired this dude.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Apparently because it's too mean if they don't do well. Even though it's well known that people who bomb the test usually don't do well in the league.

No wonder Parcells fired this dude.
Click to expand...


I asked Grok about this and it said there was no correlation but then it used Vince Young and Morris Claiborne as evidence that it’s not a good predictor. :lol

Also said they’ve moved away from the Wonderlic and are now using the S2, which is a 45 minute cognitive test. It has shown to be a good predictor of success for quarterbacks but not 100% reliable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom