Chocolate Lab
Mere Commoner
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2014
- Messages
- 20,063
Or they know there's supposed to be, they just don't agree with it.It's almost like the fucktards don't understand that there is supposed to be a separation of powers.
Or they know there's supposed to be, they just don't agree with it.It's almost like the fucktards don't understand that there is supposed to be a separation of powers.
Well that's what Maxine said they should do if they don't get a Murder One conviction...They're gonna riot and loot no matter what the verdict is
I agree, unions are fucking awful. And if the government didn't put in all these protections for unions we wouldn't be in this situation.
Abolish every last union in this country.
It's all a joke. Team sports.
He had enough fentanyl in his body to kill 3 people. No way was this murder. Murder requires intent.He was kinda scapegoated but whatever. I think I buy manslaughter perhaps but not the murder charge.
Not necessarily intent to kill for second degree in Minnesota. Could just require intent to cause great bodily harm that then results in unintentional death.He had enough fentanyl in his body to kill 3 people. No way was this murder. Murder requires intent.
Should he have put his knee into his upper back for that long, no. Did he intend to kill him, also no.
Doesn't matter, the fucking thugs will riot anyway. They don't give one shit about the verdict. They just want to burn and steal shit.
Him putting his knee in Floyd's back was intent to cause harm? (and, yes, the pictures bear out his knee wasn't on his neck, nor did the autopsy come back with findings that support that)Not necessarily intent to kill for second degree in Minnesota. Could just require intent to cause great bodily harm that then results in unintentional death.
Still don't know if I agree with it though.