Uh, not really. If you were talking about censoring PMs etc maybe.Yeah it's more akin to the telephone company censoring or modifying your phone calls.
Sure it is, when you post something only your followers see it. Or friends or whatever. It's the same thing as a mass PM. Or a phone call with many people at once.Uh, not really. If you were talking about censoring PMs etc maybe.
Man, this whole thing is tough. One retweet takes it out of the "private" category. I'm actually on the fence on this one a bit. Yes, it is a public company and should be afforded their rights. As everyone knows I am firm on the government not interfering in the free market. After thinking about it, I think I am still leaning towards the government staying out of the way.Sure it is, when you post something only your followers see it. Or friends or whatever. It's the same thing as a mass PM. Or a phone call with many people at once.
I'm still in agreement with the thought the government should stay out of it. Just didn't agree with his analogy. Even with retweets. It's like a cell phone company saying they won't let you forward a text to all your friends that they don't agree withMan, this whole thing is tough. One retweet takes it out of the "private" category. I'm actually on the fence on this one a bit. Yes, it is a public company and should be afforded their rights. As everyone knows I am firm on the government not interfering in the free market. After thinking about it, I think I am still leaning towards the government staying out of the way.
Anybody with half a brain should be fed up with it. Regardless of political affiliation.
I love this "we" shit. Who the fuck is "we"? Him and people who like him?
Not sure of the details, but they're currently shielded from liability because they're just a platform for expression. They claim they don't express views themselves.My question is, what is his order addressing, and how is it supposed to fix the problem?
Yeah, it seems to me like more of a threat than anything.all of this is theater. Trump haters will seek an injunction and a sympathetic judge will grant it. and I doubt the administration files an appeal.
then Trump gets to say to his base "See! I tried to do something but biased judges stopped me."Yeah, it seems to me like more of a threat than anything.
That still should not mean they want government intervention.Anybody with half a brain should be fed up with it. Regardless of political affiliation.
Most certainly it is. It just goes to show you how the guy operates.Yeah, it seems to me like more of a threat than anything.
I'm mainly talking about an unbiased media. I really couldn't give a shit less about FB or twitter. I rarely us FB and have never been on twitter. Frankly, both are littered with retards.That still should not mean they want government intervention.
It is annoying but if you can't filter it for yourself and want the government to do it, you are a fucking moron incapable of thinking for yourself.
That means that person wants a peaceful, non-biased world that frankly cannot exist with the amount of information that is available and the number of outlets ready to distribute it.
So what makes you think there is any way for an unbiased media?I'm mainly talking about an unbiased media. I really couldn't give a shit less about FB or twitter. I rarely us FB and have never been on twitter. Frankly, both are littered with retards.
I want to agree because I miss the good old days before journalism became basically sensationalism.Which is sad. It never used to be that way. Journalism was a decent profession that cared about actual facts.
They are counting on it.It is annoying but if you can't filter it for yourself and want the government to do it, you are a fucking moron incapable of thinking for yourself.
Of course. We are pretty much about the stupidest nation on the face of the earth.They are counting on it.
This is the epitome of the Dems strategy.He is a dumb ass appealing to dumb asses
Uhh, if you're trying to imply there isn't bias in the media, you might want to log off.So what makes you think there is any way for an unbiased media?
NPR is about as unbiased as I can think of, yet, you have people who think they are biased.
There is continued belief that excessive incongruence with your beliefs equals intentional bias.
That is not accurate. It just means you have a perception problem.