I like Muhammed here.I'm hoping OKC goes with the kid Olynyk from Gonzaga.
But I'd have no problem taking Shabazz Muhammad.
Eh, ESPN had him as one of the BPAs.Steve Adams avg'd 7 ppg and 6 rpg and we select him #13 overall.
We could have did much better. This guy probably would have been available at the bottom of the first. We have the #29 pick.
Only time will tell.Eh, ESPN had him as one of the BPAs.
It's great for the Nets in the short term. The Celtics only looked old because their best player and best rookie both went out with injuries and had to rely on Pierce and Garnett to carry them. Those 2 can go back to being high end role players in NJ and help them make a run.I'm not going to pretend that I watch much Celtic basketball, but all I've heard is how old they are because of Garnett and Pierce. Is that a good trade for the Nets?
I'd take him in the 2nd for sure.Someone draft Jeff Whitey
I don't know how the amnesty rule works, but could Wallace be amnestied? Failing that, I read something about a stretch clause that allows the Celtics to waive him, and stretch the cap hit over 6-7 years.So the Brooklyn/Boston trade is agreed to. At first I was liking the idea of all the 1st round picks, but Gerald Wallace's contract is horrid and for 3 more years. That's a horrendous take back.
No, has to be a player on your roster when the amnesty rule was put into effect. Doesn't apply to players you traded for.I don't know how the amnesty rule works, but could Wallace be amnestied?
I got a tweet back from Larry Coon, a CBA "expert", you can't amnesty anyone you trade for. Apparently the stretch thing is an option, and he thinks Celtics will use it, but they are still paying $30M for someone not to play, difference is cap hit is approx $4M p.a. over 7 rather than $10M p.a. over 3.No, has to be a player on your roster when the amnesty rule was put into effect. Doesn't apply to players you traded for.
I think.