bbgun
let the durs continue
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 27,781
Gen X (of which I'm a member) was more of the John Hughes movies.I disagree. They get the 60s, 70s, and 80s? Fuck all that. 80s were Gen X.
Gen X (of which I'm a member) was more of the John Hughes movies.I disagree. They get the 60s, 70s, and 80s? Fuck all that. 80s were Gen X.
Gen X.A ridiculous argument I saw on Facebook this morning is discussing whether Fast Times at Ridgemont High was a Boomer movie or a Gen X movie.
Your memories of Danny White are very faint. Please recuse yourself from all Gen X conversations.Gen X.
I am 51. I am solidly in the Gen X conversation, you ageist.Your memories of Danny White are very faint. Please recuse yourself from all Gen X conversations.
on YouTubeOh, and I watched Danny White punt and throw that football many times.
late Boomer
Gen X (of which I'm a member) was more of the John Hughes movies.
Your memories of Tony Hill are very faint ...Definitely not.
Your memories of Tony Hill are very faint ...
Gen Xers in 1982 weren't old enough to see the raunchy movie.And by the way...
AI Overview
Yes, "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" is considered a Gen X movie, as it was released in 1982 and captures the experiences of teenagers during that era, which aligns with the birth years typically associated with Generation X (roughly 1965-1980).
Key points:
Release date: 1982
Generation association: Gen X
Reasoning: The film depicts the high school life and concerns of teenagers during the early 1980s, which aligns with the Gen X demographic.
That's not when the movie was released. The hole is deep enough, put down the shovel.Gen Xers in 1982 weren't old enough to see the raunchy movie.
The featured characters were mainly HS Seniors, meaning they had to have been born before 1965. Ergo, late boomers.
GK's post says so. AI would never lie.That's not when the movie was released.
"Fast Times at Ridgemont High" is considered a Gen X movie, as it was released in 1982GK's post says so. AI would never lie.