Well, I wouldn't say I dislike him, I just think he will struggle without superior talent around him.What’s the basis for saying most OU fans don’t like Hurts?
If a contract is signed in 2019 and goes to 2024, is it a 4 or 5 year deal?Yep, everyone wants shorter deals now because they want another bite at the apple on these massive signing bonuses. It's why Dak's deal isn't done.
5 years, but if the guy has a year left on his deal it's really a 4 year deal.If a contract is signed in 2019 and goes to 2024, is it a 4 or 5 year deal?
Look at all the recent deals, Wentz, Goff, Rodgers, Wilson. All 4 year deals. And Dak basically wants to be paid right in that pack of QBs.I was looking at:
![]()
NFL Contracts
A real-time, sortable list of NFL contracts including total value, guaranteed money, and complete salary breakdowns.www.spotrac.com
of the top 9 QB contracts, only 3 got (actual) 4 year deals: Wilson, Rogers, and Tannehill. The first two have rings and they're closer to the end of their careers than the beginning. Tannehill is "only" making $29.5 per...
Dak wants $38+ AND 4 years? Fuck him.
I just don't see the talent as an every down QB and passer at the NFL level.Well, I wouldn't say I dislike him, I just think he will struggle without superior talent around him.
Yeah but he's not really as good as those players.Look at all the recent deals, Wentz, Goff, Rodgers, Wilson. All 4 year deals. And Dak basically wants to be paid right in that pack of QBs.
Wentz and Goff got 4 year extensions, Eagles and Rams got the benefits of 5 years.Look at all the recent deals, Wentz, Goff, Rodgers, Wilson. All 4 year deals. And Dak basically wants to be paid right in that pack of QBs.
Lol definitely better than WentzYeah but he's not really as good as those players.
Goff arguably.
No offense but that's on the Cowboys for not doing the deal last offseason. It's a 4 year deal either way.Wentz and Goff got 4 year extensions, Eagles and Rams got the benefits of 5 years.
More durable, sure. But I think it's arguable when it comes right down to actual skills. Certainly not, 'definitely'.Lol definitely better than Wentz
Wentz is the better pure passer, but that injury history is nasty.More durable, sure. But I think it's arguable when it comes right down to actual skills. Certainly not, 'definitely'.
He's not "definitely" better than Wentz.Lol definitely better than Wentz
Take injuries away, Wentz is maybe an 8 as a passer and Dak is a 7. Dak has the extra element of being a red zone threat with his legs...He's not "definitely" better than Wentz.
"Lol"
I don't see much evidence that he isn't at least every bit as good as Goff and Wentz.Yeah but he's not really as good as those players.
Goff arguably.
Goff fell off of a cliff last year, badly.I don't see much evidence that he isn't at least every bit as good as Goff and Wentz.
Wentz is massively overrated. (Wentz is also a threat to run btw)Take injuries away, Wentz is maybe an 8 as a passer and Dak is a 7. Dak has the extra element of being a red zone threat with his legs...
Both are good.