Key word, average RBs. Do we have those? Not unless Duece and Luepke make strides.Now, I am not making comparisons, but there are other teams that have better than average OL's who have been able to squeeze a lot out of rather average RB's. If Beebee can transition to center, our line should be much improved (especially in the running game).
Well that's rough.Sports Illustrated:
Dallas Cowboys
Grade: D+
Analysis: We discussed this on the MMQB podcast, but Dallas’s continued insistence on behaving and drafting like a team that has already won something of consequence is puzzling. Guyton may have the highest upside of any tackle in this class, but owner Jerry Jones has to consider who benefits from a longer-term project when everyone on his staff is being held to the fire this year. There needs to be some thought put into Guyton’s long-term development.
- Round 1: No. 29: Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma
- Round 2: No. 56: Marshawn Kneeland, Edge, Western Michigan
- Round 3: No. 73: Cooper Beebe, G, Kansas State
- Round 3: No. 87: Marist Liufau, LB, Notre Dame
- Round 5: No. 174: Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest
- Round 6: No. 216: Ryan Flournoy, WR, SE Missouri State
- Round 7: No. 233: Nathan Thomas, OT, Louisiana
- Round 7: No. 244: Justin Rogers, DT, Auburn
It's fucking retarded is what it is.Well that's rough.
This make zero sense.Sports Illustrated:
Dallas Cowboys
Grade: D+
Analysis: We discussed this on the MMQB podcast, but Dallas’s continued insistence on behaving and drafting like a team that has already won something of consequence is puzzling. Guyton may have the highest upside of any tackle in this class, but owner Jerry Jones has to consider who benefits from a longer-term project when everyone on his staff is being held to the fire this year. There needs to be some thought put into Guyton’s long-term development.
- Round 1: No. 29: Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma
- Round 2: No. 56: Marshawn Kneeland, Edge, Western Michigan
- Round 3: No. 73: Cooper Beebe, G, Kansas State
- Round 3: No. 87: Marist Liufau, LB, Notre Dame
- Round 5: No. 174: Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest
- Round 6: No. 216: Ryan Flournoy, WR, SE Missouri State
- Round 7: No. 233: Nathan Thomas, OT, Louisiana
- Round 7: No. 244: Justin Rogers, DT, Auburn
Least favorite pick: Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma (29th overall)
Guyton has infinite upside at offensive tackle, but he’s pretty raw as things stand now. He might have a lower floor than some other offensive tackles on the board, but the Cowboys needed to spend this pick on a tackle. It might not be pretty in 2024. Guyton can be special in this league. He’s just going to need a bit of a long leash.
lol because people are retarded. He can be special but he is going to have a learning curve!!!!!! Um okHow is it a bad pick based on this?
Guyton involves projection but I don't think there's much projection with Kneeland or Beebe, what you see is more or less what you get with those guys in terms of very high floors.It's not a sexy draft and the biggest names are ones that need development to hit their upsides. Hence the bad grades. Everyone is also essentially dinging us for the draft not reversing our awful offseason agenda, and giving us an F- for our handling of the offseason is totally fair, but also not entirely relevant when evaluating the draft.
As for the draft itself, I object to factoring in need but I also think this is a wait and see draft. It's not an instant A or B grade either. There is too much projection for all the Day 1-2 picks.
At Draft Day +1, I don't put this draft ahead of obvious boom classes like 2010, 2016, and 2020, which we knew early on had some great long term pieces. Not sure it ends up better than 2021 or 2022 either.
It certainly should be better than all-time bust classes like 2009. Hopefully just by the 1st rounder panning out it ends up better than last year's class.
Anton Harrison, although I think Guyton is probably better.Jacksonville took an OT around the same area of draft last year. Same kinda developmental guy and it has worked out well. Can't remember his name.
If this draft hits on the Oline it's a great draft. If you get a good starting LT and center long term that's a big deal. I think there is probably at least one more future starter in the group. Probably Kneeland or Carson.I don't mind low grades, even if I disagree. It's all speculation anyway.
What I do mind is the backwards logic to get there.
If you claim a player has "infinite upside" and "can be special", that's very clearly not the worst pick of a "C" draft.