- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 123,832
You know it won't pass.Excellent idea.
You know it won't pass.Excellent idea.
Speaking of things that won't pass.
Any fan would appreciate this option. It also makes a surprise onsides kick even more likely.
Unfortunately you are correctSpeaking of things that won't pass.
It would pressure refs to not give away an easy first down on a defensive penalty like hands-to-face or holding, and that would then encourage rough defensive play, which might make the play extra hard anyway.Hate the 4th and 20 idea.
No we wouldn'tAny fan would appreciate this option
Yeah I'll passOnly losers would be in favor of this.
Fuck it, it’s interesting, I don’t care if the Eagles submitted it.Only losers would be in favor of this.
I don't care who proposed it, it's dumb and a gimmickFuck it, it’s interesting, I don’t care if the Eagles submitted it.
It’s a Hell of a lot more interesting than a kicker trying a spinny kick, and oh look the other team caught it. Again.
Fuck it, it’s interesting, I don’t care if the Eagles submitted it.
It’s a Hell of a lot more interesting than a kicker trying a spinny kick, and oh look the other team caught it. Again.
Yep. You want to make onside kicks more interesting and actually possible again? Get rid of the retarded kicking rules and go back to how they could kick onside kicks even ten years ago. Allow the players to get a running start againI don't care who proposed it, it's dumb and a gimmick
Yeah, though still more interesting than an onsides kick. Even before the rule change that disallowed stacking one side and using a running start, the odds of success were better but with proven increased chance of injury on a play that takes forever to set up without resembling most of the way actual football is played.Nah, it's harry high school nonsense.
Kickoffs (including on side kicks) actually are football and have been basically forever.Yeah, though still more interesting than an onsides kick. Even before the rule change that disallowed stacking one side and using a running start, the odds of success were better but with proven increased chance of injury on a play that takes forever to set up without resembling most of the way actual football is played.
If we’re targeting a 15% chance of success, then I prefer watching an actual football play over it ten times out of ten.
It only sounds like a gimmick because we are used to something else.
Someone totally new to football would most likely think the exact opposite, that this weird kicking play where the ball has to travel 10 yards before the kicking team can touch it is the actual gimmick.
It would be from your own 20, and it's a ridiculous idea.Yep, after you score and try your extra point(s), you kick. You don't keep the ball and try some gimmicky tricked up play from your own 30 or whatever.