I'm going to play devil's advocate on this one. Not to shade Aikman or anything but I think this could be a case where our opinion of a player is elevated because they played on a team that had a lot of success.
Stats aren't everything obviously but I do think it hurts Aikman a little when you look at the fact that he averaged about 17 TD passes a year. Yeah yeah, style of play, I get all that. But some of the other elite QBs like Elway and Steve Young played with strong running games as well and still managed to hit 25-30 TDs per year.
Plus Ware made an NFL All Decade team and Aikman didn't. So that's why I don't think it's that far-fetched to place Ware above Aikman. Hell, if Romo won at least one Super Bowl and made at least one other NFCCG I think there would be a case to be made that he should be on this list. That's how much team success impacts our opinions when we're making these lists.
Yea but Aikman didn't win one Super Bowl, he won three, in 4 years at that.
If he won them under some flukey circumstances like Eli did, as a bus driver who floundered around for the rest of his career, that'd be one thing, but a QB winning 3 Super Bowls in 4 years is no fluke and that alone elevates him above only a handful of the most elite players the organization has ever had.
Ware was an excellent player, and he was probably more elite relative to his position than Aikman was, but at the end of the day he was the QB of 3 Super Bowl teams in 4 years and he wasn't Trent Dilfer-ing his way to those titles. There's no way you can put an elite player with an otherwise mostly forgettable career (as a Cowboy) above that on an all-time list of Cowboys.
I also disagree about Romo, perhaps if he had won a Super Bowl, but definitely not if he just made an NFCC appearance. If that were the case you might as well throw Danny White on the list.