p1_
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 27,424
No, just in general. Or as a change up to Zeke.as a starting back? Sure.
No, just in general. Or as a change up to Zeke.as a starting back? Sure.
Yup.I don’t think anybody is questioning him as far as the role he is in. He is a very good 2nd RB, change of pace guy.
The only questioning I’ve seen would be him in a lead back role. And I agree with that. I don’t think he’d be nearly as effective as a starter.
As much as we all hate Jaylon Smith, he actually played like a passable rotational LB today. LVE and of course Parsons were better but he actually looked like he belonged in an NFL game.
We'll see how long it lasts but it's nice to see.
And this is what gives me hope still.Nothing other than we game planned correctly both weeks.
Vince Young redux
14 point swing for Lamar Jackson in two plays.
Which was obvious to anyone who paid attention.Vince Young redux
And this is what I like too -- there's much more accountability and self-awareness from this staff than there ever was from Garrett's.
Agreed. And we saw a glimpse of that against SF last season when Zeke was out.I don’t think he’d be nearly as effective as a starter.
I don’t think we know how good he is without having any skill talent around him to speak of.You take away Lamar's running and he is not a good qb
it’s only natural considering the history of the new HC and Zeke’s elite window closing.If I didn't know any better, I would think they are trying to phase him out all Jaylon Smith.
Sure Jan dot gifI don’t think we know how good he is without having any skill talent around him to speak of.
Dak or any QB would have curled into a fetal position with a similar lack of literally any blue chip support on the edges or in the backfield.
But he looks pretty good right now and he had a great off-season.it’s only natural considering the history of the new HC and Zeke’s elite window closing.