Tweet unavailable
Tweet unavailable
In the 6th or 7th I would be fine with that.Sam Ehlinger it is.
Key word is probably "depth".
He is saying basically that it is stupid to ignore the defensive needs and draft offense.Not sure I understand what he's saying here.
Yeah, I think the Sewell/Slater stuff all mock season has been to keep from getting boring and hung up on Surtain and Horn in every one.Key word is probably "depth".
Outside of Sewell I wouldn't expect an OL high.
He is saying basically that it is stupid to ignore the defensive needs and draft offense.
I took it the opposite. I think he is trying to say you can't draft for needs and ignore the players talent who is available.He is saying basically that it is stupid to ignore the defensive needs and draft offense.
Yeah I think people try to he different. So they reach for other needs so that the Cowboys don't just have the same corner in every mock. But yeah I don't think they seriously are considering LT at 10. Plus Sewell will be gone and I don't know if they even like Slater.Yeah, I think the Sewell/Slater stuff all mock season has been to keep from getting boring and hung up on Surtain and Horn in every one.
That's what I'm saying, the way he said it could be interpreted either way, unless there's context that might clarify it.I took it the opposite. I think he is trying to say you can't draft for needs and ignore the players talent who is available.
I don't think that is what he meant at all because he followed up that statement praising the Lamb pick. I think he is saying don't let need dictate your pick if someone special falls to you.He is saying basically that it is stupid to ignore the defensive needs and draft offense.