- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 125,589
That's how I took it.Or, don't be so stupid over your needs that you ignore better players?
That's how I took it.Or, don't be so stupid over your needs that you ignore better players?
Yeah Jerry is never clear. The guy sounds like he is speaking another language half the time. I actually wonder if he isn't losing it a bit.That's what I'm saying, the way he said it could be interpreted either way, unless there's context that might clarify it.
If you include the fact that he considered the reports about him with a hard on for Pitts as "not legitimate", it leans the other way.I took it the opposite. I think he is trying to say you can't draft for needs and ignore the players talent who is available.
He has been talking in circles like that for 30 years.Yeah Jerry is never clear. The guy sounds like he is speaking another language half the time. I actually wonder if he isn't losing it a bit.
Yeah, but he wasn't talking in the context of Pitts. He followed the statement with talk about Lamb.If you include the fact that he considered the reports about him with a hard on for Pitts as "not legitimate", it leans the other way.
LVEBobby Carpenter was the last LB we drafted in the first round, and he was a disaster. It won't be Parsons.
sorry. disappointing blonde linebackers look alike to me.
You shut up what you're insinuatin bout the wolf man, you hush right now!!!sorry. disappointing blonde linebackers look alike to me.
That mouth breathing carnival barker has been babbling nonsense for decades.Yeah Jerry is never clear. The guy sounds like he is speaking another language half the time. I actually wonder if he isn't losing it a bit.
Still a sliver of hope for LVE but I dont think his body will allow it to happen.sorry. disappointing blonde linebackers look alike to me.
I'd rather have picks in next years draft, this years evaluations make me nervousWould you accept?
Washington 19, 51, and 124
Baltimore 27, 31, and 94
Minnesota 14, and 78
Chicago 20, 52, and 83
NE and others would have to throw next year's first in for it to make sense
Most NFL teams are going to value next year's picks more.I'd rather have picks in next years draft, this years evaluations make me nervous
Trading up that high for Mac Jones seems silly to me. He could easily drop out of the top 10 if the 49ers don't take him. But who knows. They may really be that in love with him.The 49ers either want Justin Fields or they had an opportunity to trade up and took it while still undecided but determined to take a QB.
No way you trade that much to go get Mac Jones or Trey Lance.
I can’t imagine they use three first round picks and a third rounder for Mac Jones. They could have stayed pat and drafted him. Or waited and traded up when their guy fell to a more reasonable spot.Trading up that high for Mac Jones seems silly to me. He could easily drop out of the top 10 if the 49ers don't take him. But who knows. They may really be that in love with him.
Supposedly, Broncos and Bears are interested in Garoppolo.Jones is arguably the most pro ready of their options and if they actually intend to trade Garoppolo I think it'll be Jones.