I think a close NFC Championship loss would do it, too.I don't thinl Garrett stays unless we make the Superbowl.
God I hope thos game was Moore taking back over the offense. Literally I have no proof of it. But the offense looked way different today.
Then he would have done it last yr after the Rams game, and he didn't. In fact they basically tore up the contract they had prepared for him after that game.I think we've been kidding ourselves. Jerry has waited to extend Garrett just to appease the fans but even if we end up 8-8 he'll make up some excuse to extend him
Yeah, he has to get out of the divisional round.Then he would have done it last yr after the Rams game, and he didn't. In fact they basically tore up the contract they had prepared for him after that game.
The team definitely was fired up
I believe jeri is dying for any excuse to extend GarrettI really hope just getting in isn't enough at this point.
Umm why would he have done it after a loss?Then he would have done it last yr after the Rams game, and he didn't.
I haven't heard this before. Link?In fact they basically tore up the contract they had prepared for him after that game.
Luckily with 2 weeks to heal up I think theyvwill be fine. Quinn is a rib thing. You can usually play through those. LVE maybe a stinger.Bye week coming at awesome time.
Need positive news on LVE and Quinn. Defense was not the same without them the 2nd half, especially the pass rush.
Can you think of anyone else in recent history that let a coach they really wanted to retain become a lame duck coach (ie, a free agent)? No, everyone extends coaches they want to keep because its also a recruiting tool for hiring assistants. Top notch assistants don't usually want to go into places where they know the HC is about to be deep sixed.Umm why would he have done it after a loss?
Its buried in the article someone posted (in the NFL forum) about the Redskins coaching search. Garrett is mentioned as a possibility and they note his extension was basically pulled back after that Rams loss.I haven't heard this before. Link?
Your mistake is thinking this front office wants top tier asst coaches, we hire scouts to coach our ST's because they are familiar.Can you think of anyone else in recent history that let a coach they really wanted to retain become a lame duck coach (ie, a free agent)? No, everyone extends coaches they want to keep because its also a recruiting tool for hiring assistants. Top notch assistants don't usually want to go into places where they know the HC is about to be deep sixed.
Other than the pick I thought he played stellar. That was a dumb decision. But otherwise we used the hurry up and Dak looked in complete control of the offense.
You missed the point, but whateverYour mistake is thinking this front office wants top tier asst coaches, we hire scouts to coach our ST's because they are familiar.
Also the last thing Garrett would let happen here is to have anyone hired who is a potential replacement
It's still extremely rare to keep a coach with no contract. If you actually perform well that coach can bolt for a big pay day. It speaks volumes that Jerry didn't extend him sooner.Your mistake is thinking this front office wants top tier asst coaches, we hire scouts to coach our ST's because they are familiar.
Zeke looked like a different man today. Not sure if he was fired up or the Eagles just suck at tackling. Either way he was way different.Zeke owns him some Eagles too.