The Wimmen Thread...

Armour protected her Tweets. :lol

But don't forget this following post, too. I guess a professional basketball player complaining about getting fouled is now disrespecting Emmett Till. :doh

 



This stuff is an institutional problem at least as much as it is an individual problem.

Organizations like USA Today, ESPN, SI, and Yahoo tacitly endorse these radical views that are anathema to both the principles of the country but also common sense simply by allowing these off the rails opinions to be published and broadcast by their companies.

I don't know what to do about it but it's like almost all of our institutions have been captured by radical ideologies that don't reflect the bulk of the citizens at large.

For my part I don't consume this garbage if I can help it. But not enough people do that, and even when they do (like with Bud Light for example), companies will put out fires if it affects them but otherwise will double down afterwards.
 
This stuff is an institutional problem at least as much as it is an individual problem.

Organizations like USA Today, ESPN, SI, and Yahoo tacitly endorse these radical views that are anathema to both the principles of the country but also common sense simply by allowing these off the rails opinions to be published and broadcast by their companies.

I don't know what to do about it but it's like almost all of our institutions have been captured by radical ideologies that don't reflect the bulk of the citizens at large.
You are far too generous with the bolded.
 
Organizations like USA Today, ESPN, SI, and Yahoo tacitly endorse these radical views that are anathema to both the principles of the country but also common sense simply by allowing these off the rails opinions to be published and broadcast by their companies.

It's unfortunate that we live in a society today that the only way to get attention is to act this way. People's attention span is too short. You have to make ridiculous claims to even read their shit. Let's be honest, if the lady wrote a nice article about Clark and her positive impact on the WNBA basically no one would read it. So you write drivel like this because you know it will get attention. Even if the attention is at the cost of thinking the writer belongs in a loony bin.
 
Let's be honest, if the lady wrote a nice article about Clark and her positive impact on the WNBA basically no one would read it.
I think more than that is that her colleagues would shun her. Peer approval above all.

And I don't even think this was clickbait. She's so indoctrinated, I think she actually believes it.
 
You said you got in trouble with an Asian co-worker. We have the receipts.
I would be curious what I said. I don’t work with any Asians. Not currently, at least. Wait, you mean the racist Asian customer?
 
I would be curious what I said. I don’t work with any Asians. Not currently, at least. Wait, you mean the racist Asian customer?
You didn't specify customer, so I assumed co-worker. My bad.

 
You didn't specify customer, so I assumed co-worker. My bad.

Where in that did you get co-worker?
 
Back
Top Bottom