- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Messages
- 11,888
Did Welker? Does Edelman?
He is a niche player. He just needs to do what he does well and it looks like he is doing it.
He should compensate some for the lack of lead runner.
Did Welker? Does Edelman?
He is a niche player. He just needs to do what he does well and it looks like he is doing it.
Cool, thanks for letting us know.

Randle showing up as the mentally weak guy I have told you all about.
Of course, I now admit I was wrong about Shrimp Beasley. That little shit is tearing it up.
That should be a mod's responsibility.
![]()
Did Welker? Does Edelman?
If you don't vary your game, good defenses will pin you down. Dallas needs better production.Give it up.
Both absolutely did just that.
Recall the pattern Welker ran on his famous Superbowl drop. And Edelman totally broke out this past season which probably put the Pats offense over the top with a healthy Gronk.
If you don't vary your game, good defenses will pin you down.
Both absolutely did just that.
Recall the pattern Welker ran on his famous Superbowl drop. And Edelman totally broke out this past season which probably put the Pats offense over the top with a healthy Gronk.
If you don't vary your game, good defenses will pin you down. Dallas needs better production.
If Edelman can up his game, Beasley can.

That Welker play was from the slot and Edelman plays 95% from the slot and chew on these stats.
In their 1st 3 years
This offense works best when the defense doesn't know what's coming.
If he was struggling to get open you'd have a point. I don't care how limited a WR is if he consistently gets open and catches balls. That's what Beasley can do.
If he was struggling to get open you'd have a point. I don't care how limited a WR is if he consistently gets open and catches balls. That's what Beasley can do.
I think we saw the whole passing game taken down several notches in the playoffs and yeah I lay that partially at his feet. They swarmed Dez, so it's up to the other WR's to break the game open. Instead Witten was the one shaking loose and while I love the guy he's not exactly a game-breaker.
Catching the ball is one thing, but Beasley is going to have to learn to actually do something with it once he catches it. It's a major part of a WR's job.
Getting a first down is good, but you need to chew up yardage so we don't need so many more first downs.
Part of that is on Romo leading him properly, but it comes down to the route being run. If a guy just squares in with his back to the post every time, YAC is very, very hard.
I think we saw the whole passing game taken down several notches in the playoffs and yeah I lay that partially at his feet. They swarmed Dez, so it's up to the other WR's to break the game open. Instead Witten was the one shaking loose and while I love the guy he's not exactly a game-breaker.
Catching the ball is one thing, but Beasley is going to have to learn to actually do something with it once he catches it. It's a major part of a WR's job.
Getting a first down is good, but you need to chew up yardage so we don't need so many more first downs.
Part of that is on Romo leading him properly, but it comes down to the route being run. If a guy just squares in with his back to the post every time, YAC is very, very hard.
Jesus Christ, your position here is really dumb. The guy does nothing but get open, catch balls, and get first downs, and you somehow want him to be a superstar. He has a niche and he fills that niche VERY well.

This sounds like an idea for a "hot take" article.
![]()
Fine. Fine. Avalanche of pro-Beasley opinions aside (yeesh), the initial premise was a desire to attack the entire field, which is exactly what Welker was doing on that play, regardless of where he lined up.
We don't need a bunch of one-trick ponies, no matter how good that trick is.
Even Alvin Harper, mental midget that he was, supplemented his leaping ability with an all-around game. That famous 70 yard catch against San Fran came on a play when he and Irvin switched positions ad-hoc.
Could either of our secondary receivers do that with Dez?
This offense works best when the defense doesn't know what's coming.
? Don't care about how they started, just that Beasley gets to were Edelman got to in 2014
I think we saw the whole passing game taken down several notches in the playoffs and yeah I lay that partially at his feet. They swarmed Dez, so it's up to the other WR's to break the game open. Instead Witten was the one shaking loose and while I love the guy he's not exactly a game-breaker.
Catching the ball is one thing, but Beasley is going to have to learn to actually do something with it once he catches it. It's a major part of a WR's job.
Getting a first down is good, but you need to chew up yardage so we don't need so many more first downs.
Part of that is on Romo leading him properly, but it comes down to the route being run. If a guy just squares in with his back to the post every time, YAC is very, very hard.

Beasley Playoffs
7-101, 14.4 ypc.
Explain how he was the problem again?