Sanders was the one RB that legit was scary.
I realize it is blasphemy, but he was a better RB than Emmitt Smith.
I realize it is blasphemy, but he was a better RB than Emmitt Smith.
All around? Nope. Better pure runner? Sure. I’ll give you that. But Emmitt was better every where else. If I’m starting a team, I take Emmitt every time.
Talking about Emmitt in the NFL nostalgia thread and work ethic in the Random Cowboys Thread. I love this board.![]()
2nd and 3rd best QB in team historyWell, shit, while we're at it let's a do an Aikman/Staubach debate.
I think Aikman was the better passer, but Staubach had more tools with his legs. Discuss.
Can't argue with that.And he's one of the GOATS at the position at being clutch.
Amen. Sanders was flashier, sure. Gale Sayers was flashier too and no one argued he was the greatest.
They couldn’t because he was not nearly as productive. Sanders had the numbers when he retired.
Over Sayers, sure. Mostly because Sayers had a much lower usage and broke down very young.
I'm just saying the flashiness alone isn't enough to say Sanders is better than Emmitt.
Emmitt's goalline leaps were incredible.Emmitt was a TD machine too.
Barry would get subbed out near the goalline because he was unreliable in short yardage.
I can't think of too many things more damning to a RB than your coach not having full confidence in your ability to get the tough yards when you absolutely have to have them.