- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 141,649
Russini lives in my building and bangs a 70 year old news anchor at the NBC station she works at, so I'm going to need more confirmation than that.

Russini lives in my building and bangs a 70 year old news anchor at the NBC station she works at, so I'm going to need more confirmation than that.

This also doesn't change how I view the DT position, I would still love to have Brown or Goldman next to Crawford. I realize we don't seem to value 1 techniques too much but either of these guys could give us pass rush while stuffing the run, and in Brown's case he could probably even play some 3 technique.
I also wouldn't hesitate to take Dupree at 27 if he was there, you could put Hardy at DT in the nickel/dime and have a line of Lawrence-Crawford-Hardy-Dupree in passing situations.
All this does is free up our draft and not make us more desperate. I'd still love to add talent to the DL if it's there, and it'd be one of my top priorities, but we don't have to feel desperate for it.
I'd like DL in round one, but with Hardy/Lawrence I doubt we take another DE. And Marinelli has been quoted as saying a 1-tecnique isn't worth using a 1st rounder on. We could make an exception at 27, but I think it'll come down to RB/CB/LB.
He's better than you give him credit for, if he can stay on the field he's the type of guy you can build a DL around.
Feel like its too good to be true we steal a 15 sack player who stays here for half a decade.
I have to expect 10.
Do NOT continue talking about the moral/legal Greg Hardy issues in this thread. This thread is about the possible signing of Greg Hardy and to keep others updated on the process.
If you continue to argue in this thread about the moral/legal issues arguments, you will get a vacation.
w00t
![]()
You, sir, should check your Facebook feed.
I try to stay off of there during the day...too many shady folks out there.