2026 Draft Week Chatter Thread...

Genghis Khan said:
Yeah I really believe Lawrence wasn't going to last much longer. A few picks max.

And that's fine if you like a bunch of players about the same.

But if you don't, if you think he's head and shoulders above the rest, just take your guy.

They already traded down once and picked up a couple more picks. Don't get greedy.
Click to expand...

If TJ Parker was my next best I'm glad we didn't risk it.
 
Cowboysrock55 said:
If TJ Parker was my next best I'm glad we didn't risk it.
Click to expand...
Parker’s a good comparison, or maybe R Mason Thomas, Cashius Howell, Derrick Moore, or Zion Young, 3, 8, 9, 12, and 13 picks into the second round. Or Gabe Jacas exactly one round later than we chose Lawrence in the 1st at 23rd in the 2nd.

Is Lawrence so much better than these guys that we could only drop three picks to get our EDGE? He was solidly in the midst of that group pre-draft, and it was a surprise to see him jump to the first round.

We could have dropped a bit more and received even more draft capital. Is Lawrence worth Jacas and another 2nd/future 1st plus another 4th because that’s the point differential (360 points) between 23rd in the first and 23rd in the 2nd.

We’ve convinced ourselves that Lawrence is worth all that, but I’m not sure.
 
You come up with all these fantastic trade down scenarios like they're as easy to obtain as getting out of bed. Yet, I don't remember anybody trading their first round pick for a 2027 1st. Maybe they did and I don't remember. Enlighten me.

We all can conjure up these fantasy trades. Doesn't mean they'll come to fruition tho.

And as for it being a surprise seeing Lawrence go in the first, maybe it was to you. But to most that were paying attention, it wasn't a surprise at all. Hell, it's been mentioned by multiple people that both Buffalo and San Francisco were targeting him in the first. And they both bailed out of their picks after he was taken by us.
 
ravidubey said:
Each finding fantasy trades to do so.
Click to expand...
Oh, is that so? They dropped a few spots, just like we did. But I sure didn't see them gathering up all these next year 1sts and 2nds like you were bloviating about. The niners dropped a couple spots and the Bills traded down a few times, picking up a 2nd and 3rd after dropping out of the first completely. Also swapped pick places a time or two. Certainly nothing earth shattering like you mentioned above.

Notice you just dismissed their interest in Lawrence, tho. But then again, that wouldn't have supported your "surprise at being taken in the first" theory.
 
NoDak said:
Oh, is that so? They dropped a few spots, just like we did. But I sure didn't see them gathering up all these next year 1sts and 2nds like you were bloviating about. The niners dropped a couple spots and the Bills traded down a few times, picking up a 2nd and 3rd after dropping out of the first completely. Also swapped pick places a time or two. Certainly nothing earth shattering like you mentioned above.

Notice you just dismissed their interest in Lawrence, tho. But then again, that wouldn't have supported your "surprise at being taken in the first" theory.
Click to expand...
I don’t think there’s a person here who was expecting Lawrence to go in the first. Show us those posts, if you would. It was a total surprise.

And I’m not saying teams had to trade down so far, but was describing the difference between Lawrence and Jacas in draft trade value as an illustration. It’s 410 points to drop from 1-23 to 2-23, are we saying Lawrence and a chance at an option year are that much better than Jacas?

I don’t think so because it’s a deep class. Parker is a good rusher despite Clemson’s underachieving as a whole. So are Howell, R, and a bunch of these guys.

The Cowboys were saying Lawrence was not only better than all of them, but he was worth the extra draft capital that a trade down would have bought.

I think they wanted to show off a second 1st round pick as much as anything else, but Lawrence was a reach at 23. I think they could have had any of those guys I was bloviating about, taken the extra picks and done better overall.

Seriously. Show me the mocks where any of us had Dallas taking Lawrence in the 1st round.
 
ravidubey said:
Seriously. Show me the mocks where any of us had Dallas taking Lawrence in the 1st round.
Click to expand...

Ravi, my man... Several of us had him going to us, and hoping for it.

Here's an article with all the pundits predicting it:


Where is UCF football's Malachi Lawrence projected in NFL mock drafts?

Daniel Jeremiah, NFL.com (April 22): Dallas Cowboys, Round 1, No. 20 overall

Pete Prisco, CBS Sports (April 23): Dallas Cowboys, Round 1, No. 20 overall

Michael Middlehurst-Schwartz, USA TODAY (April 23): Dallas Cowboys, Round 1, No. 20 overall

Dan Parr, NFL.com (April 23): Tampa Bay Buccaneers via trade with Pittsburgh, Round 1, No. 21 overall

Trevor Sikkema, NFL Stock Exchange (April 22): Los Angeles Chargers, Round 1, No. 22 overall

Dane Brugler, The Athletic (April 15): Buffalo Bills, Round 1, No. 26 overall

Ryan Wilson, CBS Sports (April 23): Buffalo Bills, Round 1, No. 26 overall

Field Yates, ESPN (April 23): Buffalo Bills, Round 1, No. 26 overall

Jordan Reid, ESPN (April 20): San Francisco 49ers, Round 1, No. 27 overall

Connor Rogers, NBC Sports (April 22): Kansas City Chiefs, Round 1, No. 29 overall

Jacob Infante, PFSN (April 20): Kansas City Chiefs, Round 1, No. 29 overall

Lance Zierlein, NFL.com (April 22): Kansas City Chiefs, Round 1, No. 29 overall

Peter Schrager, ESPN (April 22): Dallas Cowboys via trade with Kansas City, Round 1, No. 29 overall

Eric Edholm, NFL.com (April 20): New England Patriots, Round 1, No. 31 overall

Nathan Jahnke, Pro Football Focus (April 20): New England Patriots, Round 1, No. 31 overall

Matt Miller, ESPN (April 23): Seattle Seahawks, Round 1, No. 32 overall
 
boozeman said:
Click to expand...

He has a good point. It's stupid to put his arm length across the bottom of the screen at the greatest moment of the kid's life. It's careless and dumb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom