- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 25,272
I believe this is KD Drummond??? Interview with Dez.
Quit posting that goddamn Chinese shit.
I believe this is KD Drummond??? Interview with Dez.
I just heard that Dak's contact has a loophole that could reduce next year's cap hit from $60M to $40M by converting some of his salary into a signing bonus... is this accurate? If so, $40M (or $20 and $20 if designated a 6/1 cut) is a lot easier to swallow.
I just heard that Dak's contact has a loophole that could reduce next year's cap hit from $60M to $40M by converting some of his salary into a signing bonus... is this accurate? If so, $40M (or $20 and $20 if designated a 6/1 cut) is a lot easier to swallow.
They were discussing this on the Fan last week and it doesn't affect the cap hit. It just reduces how much the Cowboys would pay him.
That guy was a Prince!This is actually the first time I heard this, but I was watching an older Irvin interview and he said the wheels between Jimmy and Jerry started coming off because Jerry wanted to parade some royalty from foreign countries (probably fucking ragheads from the oil producing nations) through the locker room.
That was Prince Bandar right after the Chicago game in 1992 if I remember correctly.This is actually the first time I heard this, but I was watching an older Irvin interview and he said the wheels between Jimmy and Jerry started coming off because Jerry wanted to parade some royalty from foreign countries (probably fucking ragheads from the oil producing nations) through the locker room.
Fuckin figures.That was Prince Bandar right after the Chicago game in 1992 if I remember correctly.
I think you actually have that backwards. They can lower the cap hit but Dak's really getting paid the same. By converting base salary to signing bonus you're shifting a portion of that cap hit to the voidable 2025 and 2026 years. Basically you're reducing the cap figure for Dak in 2024. However by doing that in 2025 even if his contract has expired you'll have to take that money on the cap because the voidable years void and thus what you pushed out becomes due.
Hypothetically what I'm saying is you can reduce Dak's cap hit next year, let him play out the last year of the deal (The voidable years automatically void, they aren't real) but then you'll still be accounting for Dak in 2025 against the cap. It is a way though to let Dak play out this contract if you want and move on after next season.
Not according to the Fan. They might be wrong I guess.
They must have said it incorrectly then. It doesn't make any sense the way you're saying it.
You could make the case that Jerry is in fact one of the absolute worst owners in sports history. I mean, I guess he wins if all it comes down to is dollars, but the only reason his team has won anything.....ever was due to him being able to tolerate a man with a real football intellect for 5 years.
First time you heard that? You living under a rock or something?This is actually the first time I heard this, but I was watching an older Irvin interview and he said the wheels between Jimmy and Jerry started coming off because Jerry wanted to parade some royalty from foreign countries (probably fucking ragheads from the oil producing nations) through the locker room.
I don't think the cutting him would work that way. Right now he has like a voidable year or two on his deal. So if you convert some of next years salary to signing bonus you're just taking what he is getting paid and spreading some of it into 2025 and 2026. The problem is if you cut him it all comes due. Meaning a June 1 cut is still 30 and 30.