GB just signed the Raiders RB despite already having a good one.
I don't care if we draft him or not. But taking an injured RB in the second would cause people's blood pressure to go through the roof, and that's worth it in itself. Good comedy.You like the guy?
I don't care if we draft him or not. But taking an injured RB in the second would cause people's blood pressure to go through the roof, and that's worth it in itself. Good comedy.
I am certainly not quaking in my boots.That feels like they are making a mistake. I don't think he's an upgrade over Reddick if they dump him. Certainly an overpay.
That feels like they are making a mistake. I don't think he's an upgrade over Reddick if they dump him. Certainly an overpay.
Oh no. Please. Stop.
Oh no. Please. Stop.
I'd rather have Henry over Barkley. Barkley doesn't worry me nearly as much. Barkley has 1 thousand yard season in the last 4 and was under 4 YPC in 3 of the last 4.
That and they're paying Barkley like a top 3 RB at age 27.
I'd like to sign Henry but I wouldn't give him 10/year, let alone 13/year, I might not even give him 8/year honestly.
Just sign Zack Moss, Gus Edwards or D'Onta Foreman and draft a guy.
what # will he wear?I agree overall but I think I'd give Henry 10. It's probably an overpay but at the same time I think the impact would be pretty large.
