2023 Random Cowboys Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fuck it, I love him.
Yeah, I watched one of those 105.3 interviews of him the other day. Very down-to-earth and likable guy.

Here it is:
 
Fuck it, I love him.

Yeah I didn't really like the pick. Just wasn't a big fan at the time. But I'm hopeful based on the stuff I'm reading and hearing about him since joining the Cowboys. I honestly think we have a few good young LBers although extremely unproven at this point. It's like LVE and then guys with speed, athletic ability and talent who haven't really proven themselves at all yet.
 
Yeah, I don't agree that he'd be nearly as easy to replace as you claim. Teams spend years. Decades, trying to find a QB even as good as Dak is.

No, this isn't really true.

Who spends decades? The Redskins? The Dolphins? Those teams tend to be more ineptly run than we are.

Most teams cycle in and out of QBs who are roughly as good as Prescott. Maybe a little worse. Maybe a little better.

And even if it's a little worse, again, at some point, the cap savings and assets you'd get back in trade outweigh the slight difference.

Let's not discount the very real possibility that you actually find someone better, too, and then move the needle off this merry go round of second round exits.

It's a myth that finding a top 10 QB takes decades. Yeah, maybe you aren't gonna get a Mahomes or Manning or Brady. But a Phillip Rivers or Tony Romo or someone of that caliber is very findable.
 
No, this isn't really true.

Who spends decades? The Redskins? The Dolphins? Those teams tend to be more ineptly run than we are.

Most teams cycle in and out of QBs who are roughly as good as Prescott. Maybe a little worse. Maybe a little better.

And even if it's a little worse, again, at some point, the cap savings and assets you'd get back in trade outweigh the slight difference.

Let's not discount the very real possibility that you actually find someone better, too, and then move the needle off this merry go round of second round exits.

Who is cycling through top 10 NFL QBs frequently? You say most teams. Well most teams don't have a top 10 QB first of all. But I'm very curious who is getting a top 10 QB and just letting them go in order to replace them with another top 10 QB?
 
Most teams cycle in and out of QBs who are roughly as good as Prescott. Maybe a little worse. Maybe a little better.

Hardly. There are about half of the teams in the NFL that haven't have a QB at Prescott's sustained level in a decade or more.
 
Who is cycling through top 10 NFL QBs frequently?

Most teams cycle through QBs who are "roughly" as good as Prescott, I said.

Prescott is fringe top 10. The difference between him and the midway point is smaller than the difference between him and the elite.

Most teams cycle through QBs who are between fringe top 10 and fringe bottom 10.

You say most teams. Well most teams don't have a top 10 QB first of all. But I'm very curious who is getting a top 10 QB and just letting them go in order to replace them with another top 10 QB?

None of this is what I said.
 
Last edited:
This is the first year anyone has considered Dak a "Top 10" qb, mainly because Brady retired and Wilson/Watson have fallen off a cliff.
 
Between Aikman and Romo seemed like an eternity, but it was just 5 or 6 years.

It's astonishing how fortunate we've been to have Romo and Dak for the last 15+ years.
 
Hardly. There are about half of the teams in the NFL that haven't have a QB at Prescott's sustained level in a decade or more.

This is absurdly untrue. Half in the last decade? No.

These are the ones I can think of in the last decade (and I'll restrict it to "decade," instead of the even more untrue "decades," assertion):

Jacksonville.
Tennessee.
Miami.
Maybe the Jets, but they have Rodgers now.
Washington MAYBE, but Cousins was probably similar level.
Chicago.
Carolina.
San Francisco.

8 at best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom