Yeah, I watched one of those 105.3 interviews of him the other day. Very down-to-earth and likable guy.Fuck it, I love him.
Fuck it, I love him.
Yeah, I watched one of those 105.3 interviews of him the other day. Very down-to-earth and likable guy.
Here it is:
Yeah, I watched one of those 105.3 interviews of him the other day. Very down-to-earth and likable guy.
Here it is:
You’re too easy, bro. Let him hit someone first, then you can explode.Fuck it, I love him.
Pie. Only so much of it.Well there goes the room to sign any FAs
Yeah, I don't agree that he'd be nearly as easy to replace as you claim. Teams spend years. Decades, trying to find a QB even as good as Dak is.
No, this isn't really true.
Who spends decades? The Redskins? The Dolphins? Those teams tend to be more ineptly run than we are.
Most teams cycle in and out of QBs who are roughly as good as Prescott. Maybe a little worse. Maybe a little better.
And even if it's a little worse, again, at some point, the cap savings and assets you'd get back in trade outweigh the slight difference.
Let's not discount the very real possibility that you actually find someone better, too, and then move the needle off this merry go round of second round exits.
Most teams cycle in and out of QBs who are roughly as good as Prescott. Maybe a little worse. Maybe a little better.
Who is cycling through top 10 NFL QBs frequently?
You say most teams. Well most teams don't have a top 10 QB first of all. But I'm very curious who is getting a top 10 QB and just letting them go in order to replace them with another top 10 QB?
pipe down, ErnieIt's astonishing how fortunate we've been to have Romo and Dak for the last 15+ years.
You just gonna take this, @mcnuttz?pipe down, Ernie
Hardly. There are about half of the teams in the NFL that haven't have a QB at Prescott's sustained level in a decade or more.