2022 College Football Chatter

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would take both of Georgia's TEs.

But I know we got a couple good ones already. Maybe I am like Parcells, gotta collect 'em.
 
Surely UGA is talented enough to pull this off. But the Tigers have given them every damn thing they have.
 
boozeman said:
I would take both of Georgia's TEs.

But I know we got a couple good ones already. Maybe I am like Parcells, gotta collect 'em.
Click to expand...

Bowers is a Pitts-level prospect so I'd take him regardless of how solid Ferguson and such are. But he's going in the top 10 and barring some sort of disaster there's no way we're in the top 10 either this year or next, since he's not eligible in 2023 I believe.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Is it one of these woke trendy things that colleges have to have some fat, homely cheerleaders now? I've seen that at several games now.
Click to expand...

I don't think it's a new thing.

I've noticed at least one 'big-boned' cheerleader on quads for quite some time now. Especially with schools located in the south and midwest.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
I will say that just by my eye test, OU looks incredibly ordinary out there, even before today. I don't see many NFL looking guys like they've had the last several years.
Click to expand...
I think yesterday was a combination of limited talent mixed with a god awful defensive game plan.

I stopped watching at halftime but from what I saw in the first half OU was only sending 3 or 4 guys on mot plays and sitting in a soft zone. They were literally giving Duggan at least 5 seconds to throw on passing plays. Hell, even Quincy Carter can carve you up if you let him sit comfortably in the pocket for and basically play 7 on 7.

So what I want to see going forward is for them to play with some aggressiveness. Take the fight to the other team instead of sitting on your heels absorbing punches all day. The send 3 drop 8 strategy doesn't work if you don't have studs on the DL. Which we don't.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Is it one of these woke trendy things that colleges have to have some fat, homely cheerleaders now? I've seen that at several games now.
Click to expand...
FAT SHAMER!
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Did he routinely miss open receivers like he has this year? And not by a little bit. I mean, it's bad. He's overthrowing very open guys by several yards at times.
Click to expand...
Yep. He’s got a lot of arm talent and can throw a pretty deep ball, but he’s inconsistent. That’s one reason he pushes it deep so much. Wants all the make up yardage.
 
Kind of crappy but both punters in that game are rugby style where they step out to the right when they kick. If all you see is daylight in front of you shouldn’t you run? If it was an intentionally called fake punt then yes but…
 
shoop said:
Kind of crappy but both punters in that game are rugby style where they step out to the right when they kick. If all you see is daylight in front of you shouldn’t you run? If it was an intentionally called fake punt then yes but…
Click to expand...
I stopped watching at half time. It was a blowout and the wife wanted to watch something else.
 
Smitty said:
Heels are 4-1, not bad
Click to expand...
Just thought of this when I saw your name , but the other day Broaddus said we really liked Howell and if we didn't love and think we needed Sam Williams, we might have taken him as early as the second.

Who knows how true that is (it is Broaddus) but if true it's kind of interesting.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Just thought of this when I saw your name , but the other day Broaddus said we really liked Howell and if we didn't love and think we needed Sam Williams, we might have taken him as early as the second.

Who knows how true that is (it is Broaddus) but if true it's kind of interesting.
Click to expand...
Well, since Broaddus is functionally retarded I wouldn't put much stock in what he says.

If we were so enamored with Howell in the second and almost took him then, why didn't we take him in the third? The fourth? Howell was taken in the fifth round fer chrissakes.
 
NoDak said:
Well, since Broaddus is functionally retarded I wouldn't put much stock in what he says.

If we were so enamored with Howell in the second and almost took him then, why didn't we take him in the third? The fourth? Howell was taken in the fifth round fer chrissakes.
Click to expand...
Also I don't see any way we take a qb in the 2nd this year given the way the Jones decimated the team and refuse to spend on FA
 
NoDak said:
Well, since Broaddus is functionally retarded I wouldn't put much stock in what he says.

If we were so enamored with Howell in the second and almost took him then, why didn't we take him in the third? The fourth? Howell was taken in the fifth round fer chrissakes.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was thinking it was the fourth but didn't look it up. I knew it was a long wait for Smitty in the green room.

But I wondered the same thing. Like you said, it's Broaddus.
 
Chocolate Lab said:
Yeah, I was thinking it was the fourth but didn't look it up. I knew it was a long wait for Smitty in the green room.

But I wondered the same thing. Like you said, it's Broaddus.
Click to expand...
Broaddus bitch ass blocked me on twitter for making fun of Spags "if hes so good why is he available" bs when I brought up he first coined that line and made fun of a call-in to the radio(think he was on the Ticket back then) about him wanting us to sign LaRoi Glover and then we did a couple weeks later and Spags immediately pivoted to how smart our FO is
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom