jsmith6919
Honored Member - RIP
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 28,407
Other then Ravi, I don't think anyone likes the WRs or RBs of the Patriots.Other than Gronk they have no one on offense who scares you.
I like Blount.Other then Ravi, I don't think anyone likes the WRs or RBs of the Patriots.
He's not even a 1000 yard back. Plus he is about as unreliable as they come.I like Blount.
Edleman is.He's not even a 1000 yard back. Plus he is about as unreliable as they come.
I kind of like Blount too, but I don't think he is some sort of a stud starter or anything.
No offense but Edleman wouldn't do shit on any NFL team other then the Patriots. The dude averages like 10 yards per catch which is pathetic for an NFL WR. No one legitimately fears that guy. I don't think he cracks the top 3 WRs in Dallas.Edleman is.
Who cares who he plays for? He is a legit weapon. And 10 yards a catch is pathetic all of a sudden? Really?No offense but Edleman wouldn't do shit on any NFL team other then the Patriots. The dude averages like 10 yards per catch which is pathetic for an NFL WR. No one legitimately fears that guy. I don't think he cracks the top 3 WRs in Dallas.
And it was facilitated by an absolute perfect pass from Big Ben.That was probably the best play of DHB's career.
For a WR? Absolutely. You do realize that legit stud WR's like Dez average like 16 ypc. Hell even Beasley at least averages 11. If you want to know why Edelman has his one 1000 yard season? It's 150 passing targets.Who cares who he plays for? He is a legit weapon. And 10 yards a catch is pathetic all of a sudden? Really?
Antonio Brown (considered by many to be top 5 in the league) only hits at 13 per catch. Damn close to pathetic.For a WR? Absolutely. You do realize that legit stud WR's like Dez average like 16 ypc. Hell even Beasley at least averages 11. If you want to know why Edelman has his one 1000 yard season? It's 150 passing targets.
13 YPC is a far cry from 10. Can you name another 1000 yard receiver who averaged 10 yards per catch or less?Antonio Brown (considered by many to be top 5 in the league) only hits at 13 per catch. Damn close to pathetic.
Not sure if serious. 10 yards per catch is pretty bad. Cole Beasley is the epitome of that short yardage WR and he averages 11.4. That's basically TE territory.Who cares who he plays for? He is a legit weapon. And 10 yards a catch is pathetic all of a sudden? Really?
Pathetic.13 YPC is a far cry from 10. Can you name another 1000 yard receiver who averaged 10 yards per catch or less?
My point is it's not pathetic, which was the original statement.Not sure if serious. 10 yards per catch is pretty bad. Cole Beasley is the epitome of that short yardage WR and he averages 11.4. That's basically TE territory.
A decent possession receiver should be 12-14, I'd think. Big play WRs are creeping above that, 14-16.
10 is sub-TE range.
Why? It is a pathetic number for a WR. I'm just wondering if you are that out of it?Claim hyperbole on the word pathetic and we can move on.
And, 10 is sub elite TE range. Not standard TE range. So, let's not get silly.Not sure if serious. 10 yards per catch is pretty bad. Cole Beasley is the epitome of that short yardage WR and he averages 11.4. That's basically TE territory.
A decent possession receiver should be 12-14, I'd think. Big play WRs are creeping above that, 14-16.
10 is sub-TE range.
Pathetic is not the word you want.Why? It is a pathetic number for a WR. I'm just wondering if you are that out of it?