Jiggyfly
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 9,220
So you believe every arrest is justified?My question is: If the arrest was erroneous, why was she still in jail 3 days later?
Are you really that nieve?
So you believe every arrest is justified?My question is: If the arrest was erroneous, why was she still in jail 3 days later?
In a country where a man can be freed after being in prison for 10-20 years because of evidence the prosecution illegally covered up in his trial, sure 3 days in jail is ample evidence of guilt.So you believe every arrest is justified?
Are you really that nieve?
That's not even what I said.So you believe every arrest is justified?
Are you really that nieve?
That's not even what I said.
Well you seemed to think the fact that she was in jail for three days meant she must have been guilty.That's not even what I said.
Al's wild leaps while attempting to put words in people's mouth's is pretty funny.
It got bad when the cost of becoming an attorney skyrocketed and access to courts for minorities and poor people basically disappeared forever.Unfortunately cops are kind of allowed to do whatever they want, illegal confinement is a huge issue in this country. From NY's use of Rykers as a prison for the accused, to Chicago's black site for "criminal processing". It's fair to say that Habeas Corpus and Innocent before proven guilty aren't really the law of the land, since the onus is on the victim of abuse to litigate and prove they were abused.
Actually quite the opposite. If she was innocent why was she still in jail? People don't have to bond out if they don't have any charges against them. She should have been free that first day.Well you seemed to think the fact that she was in jail for three days meant she must have been guilty.
I thought she was charged with resisting arrest? Innocent or guilty you'd still have to bond out.Actually quite the opposite. If she was innocent why was she still in jail? People don't have to bond out if they don't have any charges against them. She should have been free that first day.
I didn't realize she was actually charged with something, hence my question.I thought she was charged with resisting arrest? Innocent or guilty you'd still have to bond out.
Ok, that was not clear in your 1st post.I didn't realize she was actually charged with something, hence my question.
It was actually quite clear. You just jumped to conclusions.Ok, that was not clear in your 1st post.
If she committed suicide because she was in jail it was because she was terribly unstable, not because she got arrested by an overzealous cop.I will be the first to say that the arresting officer's conduct was very unprofessional but I cannot see how the family can conclude that it caused the individual to committee suicide. She was in the cell for three days and it seems she must have made that determination on her own. Her family however is still contending she did not take her own life. They made another statement to that effect yesterday.
That seems to be the conclusion of the findings as well. The family is still holding out that there is responsibility within the system. On the surface it could be construed as posturing..If she committed suicide because she was in jail it was because she was terribly unstable, not because she got arrested by an overzealous cop.
Ok.It was actually quite clear. You just jumped to conclusions.