- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,444
Zach Martin and Micah Parson, and that's about it.Let's play a fun game. How many of the players who started for us last week or this Sunday would have started for the '93 Cowboys?
Zach Martin and Micah Parson, and that's about it.Let's play a fun game. How many of the players who started for us last week or this Sunday would have started for the '93 Cowboys?
Those are the first two who came to mind. I might go with Diggs over Larry Brown.Zach Martin and Micah Parson, and that's about it.
If you are going to start over from scratch, the players you have to start with are Micah, Tyler, Zack for as long as he's able, and maybe Diggs depending on the soon to be looming contract situation.Zach Martin and Micah Parson, and that's about it.
There's plenty of youngish players who you'd want to keep around when doing something of a rebuild (Sam Williams, Jourdan Lewis, Osa, Kearse, Pollard, Jalen Tolbert, Steele as a likely backup, McGovern/Biadasz potentially, Armstrong, Gallimore, Cox, Mukuamu, Bland, etc.) but the only guys who look to be foundational are Parsons, Diggs and Tyler, with Zack just being too good despite his age to not keep around.If you are going to start over from scratch, the players you have to start with are Micah, Tyler, Zack for as long as he's able, and maybe Diggs depending on the soon to be looming contract situation.
We aren't talking "in his prime". We're talking current team.I'd probably take an in-his-prime Tank over Tolbert.
Fine. Anger over Jett.We aren't talking "in his prime". We're talking current team.
I would agree with that.Fine. Anger over Jett.
Nope.Armstrong, Gallimore
Zach Martin and Micah Parson, and that's about it.
Tank right now is probably about even with Tolbert, Lamb would be at worst the 3rd WR although he would probably beat out Harper.I'd probably take an in-his-prime Tank over Tolbert.