Right, that's a big selling point on him, that he is one of the hardest workers and most serious guys on the team. He won't fall to the Dick Motta theory and quit his job when he wins the lottery. But is he truly that good?
I doubt they are bad. But if they don't put anything new into the defense I could see them as mediocre. I think the nice thing about Eberflus is that I think his scheme is going to at least give you a steady, average defense. Something in that 14th to 18th range. And I think with the right additions, draft picks or retentions we have a top 10 defense. But I also think his scheme may limit him from ever running a top 1-3 defense in the NFL.
I'd be surprised if there was more than one, maybe two games where they're as bad as they were in the Baltimore, New Orleans and Detroit games.
There should be zero, so even 1 or two games like that is bad.
The KC Chiefs defense gave up 30 or more three times and 29 once, and they're in the super bowl. It happens sometimes.
Once you hit 30, it's still a collapse and a game you are going to lose far more often than you are going to win. Now, it's not a guarantee you lose those games. Hell, teams have won games they've given up over 40. But that was my point. That those kind of collapses sometimes happen on even good teams. That saying it should happen zero times is a pretty hard thing to attain.
They could sign Odighizuwa and then dab their mouths as they push away from the table.
It's a great draft for DT. But much like RB we probably need 2 in the draft. Even if you resign Osa it's still a giant draft need.
No idea what you’re talking about. Jerruh just told you he paid Dak enough money to take us to there. Sit back and relax, dude
It actually is a better than average DT class. Maybe not the 3-T stud but some better than Taco Mazis well into Day 3.
It's why we should go after the best of them, even if Jeanty falls to 12.
The strength of the DT class is in the 25-60ish range, if we take one in the first it'd feel like kind of jumping the gun unless we trade down. RB is similar but there's a strong chance the top RB (and consensus top 5ish prospect) will be there whereas the DT version (Graham) should be long gone.
The draft matches up well with our massive need at RB and DT. WR not as much. There are receivers I like but it's thinner than recent years.
