- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 123,375
Jones probably doesn't even know his name. Clearly Showers sucked up to the staff for three years.Has to be a Jerry pick.
Jones probably doesn't even know his name. Clearly Showers sucked up to the staff for three years.Has to be a Jerry pick.
Considering he got fired in Seattle, not really.Is there not any confidence in Richard to determine if the guys being brought in are worth a shit?
It's worrisome because the the depth was terrible to begin with. And, the safeties we have on roster have all had histories of injury. It's a legit concern.Agreed. Not sure why the loss of Jameill Showers is getting people upset, either. It's not like he was making the team. If anything, it saved us from wasting a PS spot on him again.
Yeah it's not like Heath or Frazier is an established vet where we couldn't possibly bring in another option with starting ability.Then it is Kavon Frazier.
I dont care about Showers, I just care about Woods.Agreed. Not sure why the loss of Jameill Showers is getting people upset, either. It's not like he was making the team. If anything, it saved us from wasting a PS spot on him again.
Oh, fuck you. Don’t pull the veiled “if he’s so good, why is he available?” bullshit.I’m just saying the Cowboys clearly closed the book on Eric Reid, and therefore probably Iloka too, some time ago. And they clearly didn’t like Vaccaro and Boston.
I would have brought one in, but the off rehashed complaint that the front office is “lazy,” is, well, lazy. You think it was harder for them to go for the obvious move in Iloka than it was to dig a little and find a couple more options no one has heard of? It may be bad evaluation but it’s not “lazy.”
That being said I think they know they are thin at safety: it’s why they want Earl Thomas. But maybe there’s a reason Iloka got cut or a guy like Boston//Vaccaro were spurned all offseason that makes Dallas not want them besides “laziness.”
Please. I just came off saying maybe we should sign Paxton Lynch if he gets cut. Don’t fucking lecture me.Oh, fuck you. Don’t pulled the veiled “if he’s so good, why is he available?” bullshit.
he looks like a decent prospect, had a solid/strong career at Georgia.Best thing Ive seen all day.
Showers is a bum. His loss is no loss at all. I know absolutely nothing about the guy we just signed, but I’m confident he’ll provide everything Showers would if not more.It's worrisome because the the depth was terrible to begin with. And, the safeties we have on roster have all had histories of injury. It's a legit concern.
Love the player too. I'm just really concerned that we are rolling into the season with basically 2 safeties who are only sort of healthy.
Fuck you, Jerry.
It's just one game if it takes the full amount of weeks to heal. They like the guy so might as well cross any veteran off the wish list. You know you will get rejects or players cut at cutdown day. No use trying to tear down the wall with your head.Love the player too. I'm just really concerned that we are rolling into the season with basically 2 safeties who are only sort of healthy.
Hammy's can be tricky though. Sometimes they can take a little longer then 4 weeks and supposedly his is pretty severe. The fact that they already already are assuming he misses game one worries me. Usually that means he is questionable at best for game two. And on top of that our depth sort of sucked to start out with. It's not like Frazier and Heath are some really good veterans that you know can hold down the position. And then on top of that the fourth guy is either a scrub or someone we pluck at final cuts.It's just one game if it takes the full amount of weeks to heal. They like the guy so might as well cross any veteran off the wish list. You know you will get rejects or players cut at cutdown day. No use trying to tear down the wall with your head.
I wasnt aware that Heath had health concerns?Love the player too. I'm just really concerned that we are rolling into the season with basically 2 safeties who are only sort of healthy.
Thats all good but in the last 20 years when have the Cowboys been proactive? You will get a Domonik Sanders and if it gets worse somebody on final cuts that is cheap.Hammy's can be tricky though. Sometimes they can take a little longer then 4 weeks and supposedly his is pretty severe. The fact that they already already are assuming he misses game one worries me. Usually that means he is questionable at best for game two. And on top of that our depth sort of sucked to start out with. It's not like Frazier and Heath are some really good veterans that you know can hold down the position. And then on top of that the fourth guy is either a scrub or someone we pluck at final cuts.
I'm good with Woods and Heath as the starters but we could really use good depth if those are the guys you're counting on.
Sort of like WR where we don't have any studs starting but we have some really good depth to at least count on someone stepping up. We don't have that at safety.
Yeah about a week ago he was dealing with an ankle injury.I wasnt aware that Heath had health concerns?
Yeah it seems like we don't ever do anything until it's panic time. So when Frazier or Heath gets hurt in game one we will be in full panic mode putting Byron back at safety is my big fear.Thats all good but in the last 20 years when have the Cowboys been proactive? You will get a Domonik Sanders and if it gets worse somebody on final cuts that is cheap.
Look on the bright side, though. They like Woods so it's his starting job regardless for a few years.