- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 120,943
Beasley should have gone before him.Anthony Armstrong has been cut but may return in week 2 per Watkins.
Beasley should have gone before him.Anthony Armstrong has been cut but may return in week 2 per Watkins.
I thought Moore looked a lot better than Tanney ever has.Meaning he's one of those that everyone thinks we should have kept. "We shouldn't have let Moore go" yada yada yada.....when he wasn't very good anyway.
Tanny will be better than Moore.
Moore looked a lot better... no doubt.I thought Moore looked a lot better than Tanney ever has.
Reverse Affirmative Action.Beasley should have gone before him.
Absolutely right.I would keep Armstrong over Beasley as well...he is a viable ST player, while Beasley is not.
Good.Cowboys to waive QB Alex Tanney
August, 30, 2013
By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com
IRVING, Texas -- The Dallas Cowboys will go with two quarterbacks -- Tony Romo and Kyle Orton -- on the 53-man roster.
Alex Tanney was informed of his release on Friday, according to a source. The Cowboys could bring him back to the practice squad if he clears waivers.
Tanney played most of Thursday’s 24-6 loss to Houston, completing 17 of 31 passes for 177 yards. He was intercepted once and sacked seven times. He finished the preseason with 423 yards on 40-of-73 passing with a touchdown and two picks.
The Cowboys also released offensive lineman Edawn Coughman.
Cowboys to waive QB Alex Tanney
August, 30, 2013
By Todd Archer | ESPNDallas.com
IRVING, Texas -- The Dallas Cowboys will go with two quarterbacks -- Tony Romo and Kyle Orton -- on the 53-man roster.
Alex Tanney was informed of his release on Friday, according to a source. The Cowboys could bring him back to the practice squad if he clears waivers.
Tanney played most of Thursday’s 24-6 loss to Houston, completing 17 of 31 passes for 177 yards. He was intercepted once and sacked seven times. He finished the preseason with 423 yards on 40-of-73 passing with a touchdown and two picks.
The Cowboys also released offensive lineman Edawn Coughman.
One of my favorite parts of the cuts is remembering the Zone threads where these guys were locks for the roster and there was no way we could risk trying to slip them onto the PS.
Our depth is crap and of the ones dumped this weekend, I wouldn't be surprised if most of them never play a down of football.One of my favorite parts of the cuts is remembering the Zone threads where these guys were locks for the roster and there was no way we could risk trying to slip them onto the PS.
Let the churning begin.I wonder what the hell is taking so long for this front office to cut the trash on this roster.
I mean, really? That shit on the field last night? It shouldn't take this long.
Ok, relax. We have till Saturday. No need to rush anything.I wonder what the hell is taking so long for this front office to cut the trash on this roster.
I mean, really? That shit on the field last night? It shouldn't take this long.
I dunno about you, but when I need to take a nasty greasy shit and get it out...I do it.Ok, relax. We have till Saturday. No need to rush anything.
I don't see any advantage to cutting them all real fast. They have the roster space to pick up anyone they want already.I dunno about you, but when I need to take a nasty greasy shit and get it out...I do it.
You see, that's the issue.I don't see any advantage to cutting them all real fast. They have the roster space to pick up anyone they want already.
You say there is "nothing to talk about" but that is obviously foolish for a team trying to win something this year.
Even if they are intent on replacing 8-10 guys at the bottom of the roster, there is plenty to think about right now.
Not cutting everyone right after the Houston game is nothing to bitch about.