I don't know, but my guess is he gone.Isn't that like his tenth one?
Its only his second.Isn't that like his tenth one?
Beat Kansas by 29!!!
They'd appreciate a 50% increase in their fanbase.I might be an Indiana Fever fan next year.
If they draft Clark it will be way more than that if she can drop Logo 3's in the pros.They'd appreciate a 50% increase in their fanbase.
She's also a cocky little heifer.Not trying to hate on her or anything but I think an argument can be made that her record deserves some sort of asterisk because of the change in rules over the years.
Pior to 1972 freshmen weren't allowed to play on varsity teams. Therefore Maravich only had 3 years to accumulate his stats. Also, when Maravich played in college only 16 teams made the tournament and tournament stats didn't count towards your career numbers like they do now. So not only do modern players get an extra year, they also have the opportunity to add 8-10 games of stats to their resume via their conference and NCAA tournaments.
I said the same thing last year when some player from an obscure small university was close to breaking Maravich's record.
Wouldn't you have to have asterisks on every record then? At one point there were more games played then previously as well as other changes.Not trying to hate on her or anything but I think an argument can be made that her record deserves some sort of asterisk because of the change in rules over the years.
Pior to 1972 freshmen weren't allowed to play on varsity teams. Therefore Maravich only had 3 years to accumulate his stats. Also, when Maravich played in college only 16 teams made the tournament and tournament stats didn't count towards your career numbers like they do now. So not only do modern players get an extra year, they also have the opportunity to add 8-10 games of stats to their resume via their conference and NCAA tournaments.
I said the same thing last year when some player from an obscure small university was close to breaking Maravich's record.
I think they do sort of put asterisks on most modern records in every sport. They may not put a literal asterisk next to the record but I've noticed that they usually add qualifiers when discussing a record in order to acknowledges changes made through the eras. Like in MLB, I think they still make a point to highlight records set when the regular season was only 154 games.Wouldn't you have to have asterisks on every record then? At one point there were more games played then previously as well as other changes.
I'm fine with that. I like a little spice in my athlete. It adds to the entertainment value of the game, IMO.She's also a cocky little heifer.