Charlie Kirk Shot

Sheik

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
12,068
I don’t have an issue with this. A business has the right to refuse service to anyone. I wouldn’t have refused the service to the guy, but it’s fine that they did.
Office Depot isn’t owned by the people that run them. That’s the problem. A rogue employee(s) decided to take a stance on something that the company hadn’t put out guidance on.

They ended up unemployed and that was the correct move.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,901
Office Depot isn’t owned by the people that run them. That’s the problem. A rogue employee(s) decided to take a stance on something that the company hadn’t put out guidance on.

They ended up unemployed and that was the correct move.
They were fired? Good.


And yes, what you said is the point here.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
23,901
So to be fair, some of the first headlines Rubin was reading from Cenk’s website (“ex employee exposes Charlie Kirk’s grift,” “Charlie Kirk embarrasses himself,” “Charlie Kirk’s brain melts explaining anti vax conspiracy,”) sounded an awful lot like like the titles of many of Rubin’s own YouTube channel videos.

Some of that stuff is sensationalist to generate an audience’s interest, without crossing a line. I’m not sure Cenk is the right one to go after in this situation.
 

UncleMilti

This seemed like a good idea at the time.
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
18,636
Easier said than done. They are decentralized and unorganized. More like terrorist cells, but not even that together.
They show up in mass quite often to promote their agenda. As a designated terrorist group, they would most likely be immediately arrested or detained. They would also be put under surveillance and a ton more scrutiny than they are now.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
44,893
So to be fair, some of the first headlines Rubin was reading from Cenk’s website (“ex employee exposes Charlie Kirk’s grift,” “Charlie Kirk embarrasses himself,” “Charlie Kirk’s brain melts explaining anti vax conspiracy,”) sounded an awful lot like like the titles of many of Rubin’s own YouTube channel videos.

Some of that stuff is sensationalist to generate an audience’s interest, without crossing a line. I’m not sure Cenk is the right one to go after in this situation.

Yeah, I agree. Those I think are unfair to Kirk, but they don't sound like the type of headlines that I think incite this type of thing.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
26,023
My point is that I’m fine with a company choosing not to serve someone. Again, I would’ve printed the poster, but I find it hilarious when people were arguing in support of a bakery refusing to serve a gay couple and then getting pissed when someone refuses to serve someone of their ilk. It’s the double standard and self-victimization that I laugh at.
I think it’s more being mad at the double standard. ‘We will force you to comply, but it’s ok for us.’
 

Cujo

“I've eaten a lot of raccoons."
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,608
Office Depot isn’t owned by the people that run them. That’s the problem. A rogue employee(s) decided to take a stance on something that the company hadn’t put out guidance on.

They ended up unemployed and that was the correct move.
Very distinct difference. Employees can’t arbitrarily decide what’s propaganda or not. Fucking absurd
 

Cujo

“I've eaten a lot of raccoons."
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
5,608
They show up in mass quite often to promote their agenda. As a designated terrorist group, they would most likely be immediately arrested or detained. They would also be put under surveillance and a ton more scrutiny than they are now.

If those mfs show up here, we’re gonna beat the fucking brakes off of them.
 
Top Bottom