- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 125,489
This is "for what".No one said that. My theory was he was acting out against his father. His father is a right wing extremist. Kid goes hard the other way.
This is "for what".No one said that. My theory was he was acting out against his father. His father is a right wing extremist. Kid goes hard the other way.
What is wrong with that?This is "for what".
That’s a stretch, whether his father was a retard or not.Just the possibility that he is acting out against his retard extremist father.
Exactly. Hopefully Trump does just this….designate them a terrorist organization and declare open season on them. Eradicate them all.Antifa needs to be treated like the Klan.
A terrorist organization.
Infiltrate and take down.
Bipo: The facts aren't in yet. We don't know for sure he was radicalized by the Left.This is "for what".
The fact is that he is wearing a 3%er shirt. I'm only saying his kid rebelled, went full retard the other way.That’s a stretch, whether his father was a retard or not.
I don’t have an issue with this. A business has the right to refuse service to anyone. I wouldn’t have refused the service to the guy, but it’s fine that they did.
Easier said than done. They are decentralized and unorganized. More like terrorist cells, but not even that together.Exactly. Hopefully Trump does just this….designate them a terrorist organization and declare open season on them. Eradicate them all.
Right. Didn't we settle this years ago with the gay cakes or something?I don’t have an issue with this. A business has the right to refuse service to anyone. I wouldn’t have refused the service to the guy, but it’s fine that they did.
Pretty much. The knife cuts both ways. Either accept that it can happen to you or refuse to allow it to happen to anyone. Just be consistent.Right. Didn't we settle this years ago with the gay cakes or something?
Nope. They were forced to bake the cake.Right. Didn't we settle this years ago with the gay cakes or something?
There is a difference between having the right to do something and being ok with it. You have the right to do all kinds of shit that pisses me off. If your point is that the employee isn't doing anything illegal I agree.I don’t have an issue with this. A business has the right to refuse service to anyone. I wouldn’t have refused the service to the guy, but it’s fine that they did.
Calm thyself as well, brother.Man, tread lightly. I will leave it at that.
He was talking to Cenk Euger pronounced (jink or chink). They’re really reaching here trying to say he was talking about Asians. Don’t even think there was an Asian in the crowd.Where's the racial slur? He's not allowed to get mad?
Sure but I doubt her corporate bosses have the same opinion.Right. Didn't we settle this years ago with the gay cakes or something?
My point is that I’m fine with a company choosing not to serve someone. Again, I would’ve printed the poster, but I find it hilarious when people were arguing in support of a bakery refusing to serve a gay couple and then getting pissed when someone refuses to serve someone of their ilk. It’s the double standard and self-victimization that I laugh at.There is a difference between having the right to do something and being ok with it. You have the right to do all kinds of shit that pisses me off. If your point is that the employee isn't doing anything illegal I agree.
If your point is that people can't take offense to the employee I very much disagree with you. And frankly they will probably lose their job. If we are being honest. Not that she probably gave a shit about her job at Office Depot. Thats a dying store.