Charlie Kirk Shot

[Sheik]

I don’t have an issue with this. A business has the right to refuse service to anyone. I wouldn’t have refused the service to the guy, but it’s fine that they did.

Office Depot isn’t owned by the people that run them. That’s the problem. A rogue employee(s) decided to take a stance on something that the company hadn’t put out guidance on.

They ended up unemployed and that was the correct move.

 

[Cotton]

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Hopefully this does not continue the dumb way it is going and spurs some sort of progressive dialogue.

But it will not.

That's exactly what he was trying to do, and they killed him.

 

[Smitty]

Office Depot isn’t owned by the people that run them. That’s the problem. A rogue employee(s) decided to take a stance on something that the company hadn’t put out guidance on.

They ended up unemployed and that was the correct move.

They were fired? Good.


And yes, what you said is the point here.

 

[Smitty]

So to be fair, some of the first headlines Rubin was reading from Cenk’s website (“ex employee exposes Charlie Kirk’s grift,” “Charlie Kirk embarrasses himself,” “Charlie Kirk’s brain melts explaining anti vax conspiracy,”) sounded an awful lot like like the titles of many of Rubin’s own YouTube channel videos.

Some of that stuff is sensationalist to generate an audience’s interest, without crossing a line. I’m not sure Cenk is the right one to go after in this situation.

 

[UncleMilti]

Easier said than done. They are decentralized and unorganized. More like terrorist cells, but not even that together.

They show up in mass quite often to promote their agenda. As a designated terrorist group, they would most likely be immediately be arrested or detained. They would also be put under surveillance and a ton more scrutiny than they are now.