- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 53,243
They are also the ones saying they want nothing to do with an older back. Soooo.....Its the coaches that are saying that so lets tackle this again.....
They are also the ones saying they want nothing to do with an older back. Soooo.....Its the coaches that are saying that so lets tackle this again.....
I was specifically talking about rbs and the blitz thing. You go.They are also the ones saying they want nothing to do with an older back. Soooo.....
Christine Michael could shake loose maybe?What young RB? This has to be his way of saying they aren't doing anything at RB without actually saying it. There will be no young RB that shakes out. And, if they are young, they will be unproven in the league. I'm just not seeing it.
I liked him in the draft. Great workout numbers.Christine Michael could shake loose maybe?
That's been our MO in the past, especially after someone signs a big contractI think we'll see another vet signed after week 1. The procrastination is centered around that non-guaranteed contract loophole, IMO.
Yea without a 3 down back I don't think we have that either. A rbbc can work but you are telegraphing your playcall to an extent depending which back is in thereI agree. Just don't think we have that in Dallas.
I couldn't agree more, but I don't understand why they haven't acted as if they really believe it.
You aren't with Randle and McFadden at least. Both guys can run all of the same plays. You don't really have to telegraph anything. RBBC is sort of the same concept as we have on the defensive line. You constantly bring guys in with fresh legs going against guys who are tired and exhausted. People act like RBBC is some sort of a dirty word. It really isn't at all.Yea without a 3 down back I don't think we have that either. A rbbc can work but you are telegraphing your playcall to an extent depending which back is in there
And balance becomes harder to achieve because some are better at pass blocking/receiving than others.Yea without a 3 down back I don't think we have that either. A rbbc can work but you are telegraphing your playcall to an extent depending which back is in there
Exactly right.Jackson is beyond done. If people think what we've done this offseason to our running game is stupid, picking him up would be the retarded cherry on top of the shit sundae.
Are we really parcing what Jerry says?Even that Jerry interview tweet is a little different from what the team used to say. Before it was that we're a running team and that's the core of what we do. Now we just need to have a running game the other team respects. In other words, so they can't load up on the pass. That's different from running being your identity.
I don't even know if I'd be concerned if Linehan said that teams need to respect our running game. Do people really think coaches are choosing their words that carefully?Are we really parcing what Jerry says?
If that was coming from Garrett or Linehan I would be worried but Jerry is just rambling these days.
It's because we haven't been that bad lately. We just haven't always been that good. When you go 8-8 most years and pepper in a couple great seasons, it makes for a damn good overall record.I would not have guessed this, but we have the best cumulative record in the division and second best in the conference over the past 10 years:
source: http://imgur.com/a/o2bkx
Way to go Jerry.I would not have guessed this, but we have the best cumulative record in the division and second best in the conference over the past 10 years:
source: http://imgur.com/a/o2bkx