- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 124,141
I think feeding, educating and clothing living children is going to be more expensive than handing out abortions and contraceptives.We can fund it using the federal money that goes to Planned Parenthood.
I think feeding, educating and clothing living children is going to be more expensive than handing out abortions and contraceptives.We can fund it using the federal money that goes to Planned Parenthood.
so was Brown v. Board of Education. so what?This has got to be one of the most divisive decisions handed down by SCOTUS.
I seriously doubt that any state will totally outlaw abortion. Ban it after a certain point in the pregnancy, yes, but not outlaw it.I think feeding, educating and clothing living children is going to be more expensive than handing out abortions and contraceptives.
But it's the Supremes who are divisive.
They get about $6 billion in tax payers money every year. That would feed a lot of mouths.I think feeding, educating and clothing living children is going to be more expensive than handing out abortions and contraceptives.
That's the idea.Um, maybe -- just maybe -- behaviors will change when people know they can't use abortion as a form of birth control?
Exactly. I flipped on ABC and NBC for a minute and they were talking about how dangerous this politicized court was.
so was Brown v. Board of Education. so what?
I mean Missouri kind of did outside of medical necessity.I seriously doubt that any state will totally outlaw abortion. Ban it after a certain point in the pregnancy, yes, but not outlaw it.
There will be more states join them.