2025 Random Cowboys Stuff Thread

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,291
Just listening to the BS PC from yesterday and I'm kind of surprised how much he talked about this 5 man front, and was pretty open about saying we're going to be running that quite a bit more.

So I guess maybe it's not going to be just a changeup. Pretty interesting.
I think it's for the best since it makes it a bit easier on our smaller edge rushers to play the run.

And now after the Williams trade it emphasizes our strength, interior DL.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
54,623
Poor example. Gay is no longer a widely used term to describe happiness. Gloryhole still is used to describe a rich strike in every oilfield in the world.

Just worry about if Jerry gets too deep into a bottle of blue and starts talking about turning a cornhole into a gloryhole.
Coming from the man talking about mosquito circumcisions, Troy looking good in the shower and draft pick penises…gloryhole could be ‘gloryhole’
 

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
60,293
Just listening to the BS PC from yesterday and I'm kind of surprised how much he talked about this 5 man front, and was pretty open about saying we're going to be running that quite a bit more.

So I guess maybe it's not going to be just a changeup. Pretty interesting.
Well with an extra DT it makes sense. Williams, Clark and Osa can play and have Fowler and Ez flying off the edges. Kind of feels 3-4 ish in reality.
 

NoDak

Hotlinking' sonofabitch
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
26,178
Coming from the man talking about mosquito circumcisions, Troy looking good in the shower and draft pick penises…gloryhole could be ‘gloryhole’
You seem pretty stuck on this connotation of the word.

You might want to consider getting out of the San Fran area for a bit to heal.
 

data

Forbes #1
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
54,623
You seem pretty stuck on this connotation of the word.

You might want to consider getting out of the San Fran area for a bit to heal.
In China, they just call it food. In San Fran they just call it hole
 

Chocolate Lab

Free Phil Mafah!
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
29,361
I think it's for the best since it makes it a bit easier on our smaller edge rushers to play the run.

And now after the Williams trade it emphasizes our strength, interior DL.
Well with an extra DT it makes sense. Williams, Clark and Osa can play and have Fowler and Ez flying off the edges. Kind of feels 3-4 ish in reality.
Yep, I love it. I had thought it was just a Hail Mary to see if you can give your terrible defense any kind of short term boost, but I'm glad to hear it's a bigger part of the plan going forward.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,291
Yep, I love it. I had thought it was just a Hail Mary to see if you can give your terrible defense any kind of short term boost, but I'm glad to hear it's a bigger part of the plan going forward.
I've honestly been kind of wondering to myself over the last few weeks if it's easier to find personnel for these types of alignments, particularly since so many of the speed edge rushers nowadays and coming out of college are around 6-3, 240-250.

The 3-4 vs. 4-3 distinction is kind of dead since it's blurred so much, but for a guy like Eberflus who is sort of a 4-3 purist it's just really hard to find DE's who have the size to stop the run and the athleticism to win around the edge when pass rushing.

Going with these sorts of alignments makes it easier to cover up smaller edges like Ezeiruaku (and Parsons) while kind of just clogging the A/B gaps against the run with big bodies who don't necessarily need to be unicorns like Williams and some of the other elite DT's in the league.

Most of the top defenses in the league right now (Broncos, Rams) run this sort of stuff. I think if you have the right personnel a 4-3 can be just as dominant, maybe even more so, but if you don't have the unicorns on the DL who can both rush and stuff the run it sort of falls apart.

The Eagles are a good example, they were dominant last year and since losing Sweat and Williams their defense is kind of meh.
 

Simpleton

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
21,291
Playing a 5 man front makes a lot of sense if we're talking a 5-2-4 scheme which gets one of the shitty LBers off the field.
Yep, and guys like Ezeiruaku can handle light coverage responsibilities in the flat if you need another body in coverage from the 5 guys along the LOS.
 

Smitty

DCC 4Life
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
24,215
Defensive players I'd clearly take over Williams for the next 3 years: Myles Garrett, Micah Parsons, Maxx Crosby, Aidan Hutchinson, Jared Verse, Nik Bonitto, Will Anderson Jr.

Toss-up's: Dexter Lawrence, TJ Watt, Chris Jones, Jalen Carter, Jeffrey Simmons, Zach Allen, DeForest Buckner, Byron Murphy, Patrick Surtain, Nick Bosa
Come on, bro.
 

Chocolate Lab

Free Phil Mafah!
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
29,361
The 3-4 vs. 4-3 distinction is kind of dead since it's blurred so much, but for a guy like Eberflus who is sort of a 4-3 purist it's just really hard to find DE's who have the size to stop the run and the athleticism to win around the edge when pass rushing.
Right, I personally like this better... I just never thought Eberflus would run anything else but his beloved 43. If he actually isn't as stubborn as I thought, I may have to give him some small props.

Anyway, to what Ace posted from Owning above... Why would Williams be the 0-1? I would think that would be Clark more than QW.
 
Last edited:

Cowboysrock55

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
60,293
Doesn't sound like there is much chance of getting rid of the DC after Jer's comments how he regrets going through coordinatiors.
Well I'm sure the next 8 weeks will determine a lot. If there is no improvement with the additions I don't think Jerry will stomach it. But if the defense can claw to mediocre for 8 weeks we may see another season of Flus.
 
Top Bottom