Simpleton
DCC 4Life
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 21,200
That's what makes the decision so fascinating.Yeah Guyton looks pretty raw to do that from day one. He was also a RT in college. Of course so was Tyron Smith if I remember correctly. But Tyler was raw too and came in as a rookie and was in my opinion the best rookie lineman in the NFL that year.
Mims played RT as well and honestly looks to be built like a RT. I also have questions about why he took so long to play.
If I had to guess Guyton makes more sense if you want a LT. But both guys are pretty strictly OTs. Not exactly the Cowboys style.
The majority of the guys who look like they could be good enough at OT to keep Tyler at LG primarily only have experience at RT, guys like Fuaga, Mims, Latham and Guyton. Alt and Fashanu are really the only pure LT's in the first round because guys like Fautanu, Barton and Morgan all look like they project better to the interior, or at least in our case I think you'd rather move them inside with Tyler at LT than vice versa.
So you're either picking a higher ceiling OT who has never really played LT, or a guy who is probably better on the interior.
The added twist in all this is that Steele looked like a fuck all year and despite his extension he can easily be cut after 2024 without much of an impact on the cap. With that in mind, you might lean more towards the pure OT's who could potentially replace Steele long-term, while you still shift Tyler to LT. Or if Steele rebounds you can keep the rookie at LT long-term, Tyler at LG, Steele at RT and you have a heck of a young OL core.
But is it worth it to try to convert them to LT for potentially just a year or two if Steele continues to shit himself?
At this point I'd lean towards Fautanu or Barton if they are there, they're cleaner projections and arguably better prospects than guys like Mims and Guyton, but I wouldn't be upset about taking a bigger swing on a guy like Mims in particular.
