- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 136,351
That was all Johnson showing errbody how cutting edge he is.3 isn't always better than zero but any time you can change how many scores the other team needs you should usually do it.
That was all Johnson showing errbody how cutting edge he is.3 isn't always better than zero but any time you can change how many scores the other team needs you should usually do it.
Refs would have called that had he not caught it
My response was to boozeman and yes it was about Hurts. But if you want to make an issue be my guest.It wasn't about anybody. It was just a general statement in response to the conversation. But if you want to think it was about Hurts, by all means, have at it.
And just because he still has a job doesn't mean squat. He was massively paid and will still have that job for awhile because of it. Not because of his play. You complain about this with Prescott. Same situation...
.... as a rookie.... with Gardner Minshew throwing to him.Josh Downs...all sixty eight for 7-11 and two TDs?
Those are Cedrick Wilson numbers. 61-602 with SIX TDs.
IMO, one of his biggest weaknesses as a coach is he leans too much on emotion rather than logic in crucial situations.Yup.
It's not rocket science but yet today's NFL coaches sure do turn it into that.
And THAT is why you take the points every time!!
That was all Johnson showing errbody how cutting edge he is.
Would've made it a 3 possession game again and they would have kept the momentum.That FG would have been huge
Bad coaching decisions.Up by 17 at one point. Could have again went up by 17.
Now, very close to being tied.
Ooof.
How in the fuck was your response to booze when you quoted me? Asking ME if my post was about Hurts?My response was to boozeman and yes it was about Hurts. But if you want to make an issue be my guest.