Genghis Khan
The worst version of myself
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 38,103
There is a media wave coming at Prescott. Sturm did an article on it.
Defending or criticizing him?
There is a media wave coming at Prescott. Sturm did an article on it.
Defending or criticizing him?
Yeah he is costing us so much we just don't have a dime of cap room to spend. Damn you Prescott...Backlash over his contract I presume. Paid like a top QB , play like one.
Is your poster broke?Yeah…@Iamtdg…
if you could post the article…yeah, that would be great.
I don’t have The Atlantic anymore. Only got it for the draft.Is your poster broke?
Oh, well in that case, I will post it.I don’t have The Atlantic anymore. Only got it for the draft.
Gracias.Oh, well in that case, I will post it.
Done.Gracias.
No, I think they want McCarthy to be the scapegoat.Does anyone really think the Joneses want Dak to be a scapegoat?
That I can believe much more. Still doubt it, but the family has no real attachment to him like they do Dak.No, I think they want McCarthy to be the scapegoat.
So what are you saying? Fat Mike is not in the family portrait?No, I think they want McCarthy to be the scapegoat.
I don't think that's what he's saying though. Not that they're intentionally making Dak the scapegoat but rather they've taken the attitude that since Dak is making elite QB money, he should be able to to shoulder more of the offensive burden and therefore they can jettison good players like Cooper and Collins because they're counting on Dak to make up for it by himself.Does anyone really think the Joneses want Dak to be a scapegoat? Don't you think they'd rather he succeeded? Especially after giving him that big contract?
I mean, sure, maybe it's incompetence. But I don't think it's some plan.
Remember back when it was believed that Romo could elevate cheap talent like Crayton, Laurent Robinson etc.?I don't think that's what he's saying though. Not that they're intentionally making Dak the scapegoat but rather they've taken the attitude that since Dak is making elite QB money, he should be able to to shoulder more of the offensive burden and therefore they can jettison good players like Cooper and Collins because they're counting on Dak to make up for it by himself.
Not that they're trying to scapegoat him, but more like he will be if he fails.
To be fair, though,, they also traded tons for Roy Williams and signed TO for Romo. For years, we put almost everything into our offense and that didn't work because our defense was so bad.Remember back when it was believed that Romo could elevate cheap talent like Crayton, Laurent Robinson etc.?
If I were a rich dumbass like Goof Son, I wouldn't think that is an unreasonable request.
Roy Williams was a retarded deal. Owens might have worked out even with the clash with Parcells.To be fair, though,, they also traded tons for Roy Williams and signed TO for Romo. For years, we put almost everything into our offense and that didn't work because our defense was so bad.
I'm not defending Goof Son and his cheapness. They still should have done something at WR (which is why I still suspect they planned on drafting a WR in the first but everyone else was thinking the same thing) or just kept Cooper.
It’s Athletic.I don’t have The Atlantic anymore. Only got it for the draft.
Same thing. Cotton knew what I was talking about.It’s Athletic.