2023 Random NFL Stuff Thread…

Status
Not open for further replies.

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,007
They should put a goal post inside the goal post and those field goals are worth 4 points. If you score a TD outside of 50 yards it should be worth 10 points! Let's make the game more fun!

Nope I hate gimmicky changes too.

Exactly. Tweeks are fine, but when you are making fundamental changes to the structure of the game it's arena football, it's not the NFL.
 

bbgun

please don't "dur" me
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
23,634
A lot of fans think a fumble through the end zone shouldn’t be a touchback. They think the ball should be placed at the spot of the fumble. I disagree. You shouldn’t be rewarded for fumbling.
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,375
:unsure
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,375
A lot of fans think a fumble through the end zone shouldn’t be a touchback. They think the ball should be placed at the spot of the fumble. I disagree. You shouldn’t be rewarded for fumbling.
Same here. There should be a penalty for not protecting the ball near the goal line. Otherwise players will be practically throwing it forward there, knowing if it's ruled a fumble they get the ball back anyway.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,007
A lot of fans think a fumble through the end zone shouldn’t be a touchback. They think the ball should be placed at the spot of the fumble. I disagree. You shouldn’t be rewarded for fumbling.

But it's not rewarding someone for fumbling, it's just that you got lucky and avoided a turnover. Just like if your own guy recovers your fumble, you're not "rewarded" for fumbling. It's just that the completion of the play worked out.

What if a guy fumbles out of bounds at the five? Should that be a touchback? At the 50? Out of the end zone is the same thing. You got lucky and it went out of bounds. Still your ball at the spot it went out (or at the 1 if it went out of the end zone).

Giving the opposing team the ball just because it went out of the end zone is like rewarding the defense for not making a play.
 

Genghis Khan

The worst version of myself
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
38,007
Same here. There should be a penalty for not protecting the ball near the goal line. Otherwise players will be practically throwing it forward there, knowing if it's ruled a fumble they get the ball back anyway.

Isn't that just a forward pass?
 

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,375
Isn't that just a forward pass?
I meant like a running back or WR stretching the ball out and letting it go. I think there should be some penalty for that. It doesn't happen out in the field of play as much because there an inch or two almost never matters.

I can see the argument that you shouldn't lose the ball altogether. Maybe let the offense keep it, but put them back at the 20 or something.

But I like it the way it is. (Plus I can see endless replays of did the ball leave his hand before he was out of bounds, etc. Ugh.)
 
Last edited:

Chocolate Lab

Mere Commoner
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
20,375
Dude, that was some epic collaboration to make those youtube videos happen. ^5
Not sure what you're talking about, sir...



:unsure
 

mcnuttz

Senior Junior Mod
Staff member
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
15,867
Just noticed that Tunsil signed a 3 year $75million contract.

Crazy to think that he's been the highest paid OT for awhile now and all I think about when I hear his name is the bong mask.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom