- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 137,742
Grousing about his underwear being up his ass?he's been grousing about it already.
Grousing about his underwear being up his ass?he's been grousing about it already.
that, and coming cap killers like Parsons, Lamb and Diggs.Grousing about his underwear being up his ass?
Add Donovan Wilson. It never ends!that, and coming cap killers like Parsons, Lamb and Diggs.
Ya kain't pay evrabody.
ok, so napkin story is kinda bogus. Tablecloth is slightly different.
Extending Dak now, like in the next 3-4 months, instead of waiting another 2 years would be a smart proactive way to get some flexibility but knowing this moron he's going to wait until about this time in 2024 to start negotiations.
In a related story, Stephen Jones just picked his underwear out of his ass crack and then smelled his fingers.
Ceedee is great. Our problem and my concern all offseason is about WR2 and WR3.
Quit worrying. Tolbert will break out in his second year.Ceedee is great. Our problem and my concern all offseason is about WR2 and WR3.
They will need to address it, but they better get some talent at DT and some CB depth first. Last few times this team has lost in the playoffs it's been directly because the DTs sucked.Ceedee is great. Our problem and my concern all offseason is about WR2 and WR3.
TY to the rescue!Ceedee is great. Our problem and my concern all offseason is about WR2 and WR3.
What were you doing up at 2:24am, mister?TY to the rescue!
His bomb was impressive. Tells me he can still run and has fresh legs. I'd use him a lot more as we get to the playoffs.TY to the rescue!
Yeah, I just need one DT that can be the dude. Oddiggy is solid, and the other guys are playable. But we need a guy who can sort of be a force and require attention in the middle.They will need to address it, but they better get some talent at DT and some CB depth first. Last few times this team has lost in the playoffs it's been directly because the DTs sucked.
Need a big fat NT (re-sign Hankins?) and a dynamic 3T.
I made the same point yesterday or the day before.Does it matter that we've beaten so many teams with a winning record this year? Seems like in past years people have argued that well, yeah, we've won a lot of games but we've only beaten one or two teams with a winning record... followed by the counter that that's the case for a lot of winning teams, you can only play who's on your schedule, etc.
So timestamped again?I made the same point yesterday or the day before.