Yeah, that wouldn't be ethical at all.Bezos?
With Amazon having broadcasting rights, it seems like a conflict of interest to me.
I wouldn't have given even that much. He is garbage.
I wonder if this precludes them from taking a QB at #8.
You are little harsh...he is like a third round type QB in any draft. Not great, but he had his moments...like kicking our ass coming off of mono a couple of years ago. But yeah...the extra picks were a bit rich.I wouldn't have given even that much. He is garbage.
I'd take Trey Lance in that situation. Let him sit and learn and he may be a stud. That's just me. My guess is the Panthers won't though. Coaches don't have the luxury of patience in the NFL. So while that would be best for their team my guess is the coach is going to do everything to make Darnold work there because if not he might not have a job in a year or two.
I wonder if this precludes them from taking a QB at #8.
Yeah they literally gave up pennies in this draft for Darnold. The picks are really a year from now.Seems like insurance in case they get blocked out of a QB in the first. I'm sure they'd still go Lance or Fields if they're available, although they might pass on Jones if someone like Sewell or Pitts falls somehow.
A 2nd, 4th and 6th for insurance? If true, that’s idiotic.Seems like insurance in case they get blocked out of a QB in the first. I'm sure they'd still go Lance or Fields if they're available, although they might pass on Jones if someone like Sewell or Pitts falls somehow.
The 2nd and 4th are next year which roughly equates to a 3 and a 5 this year, which is a pittance when talking about rolling the dice at QB and avoiding being left at the altar if/when the top 4 go ahead of your pick.A 2nd, 4th and 6th for insurance? If true, that’s idiotic.
Absolutely. It has a sneaky impact on the top ten.Unfortunately I think this mostly rules out our chances of getting Sewell at 10.