Genghis Khan
The worst version of myself
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 45,373
Shut the fuck up, Calvin.
"Tony Romo also had that surgery" is not the ringing endorsement he seems to think it is.
Shut the fuck up, Calvin.
It is so gonna suck when somebody trades in front of us, takes the "Last of the Mohicans" and we are all like
But I bet there were some dumb asses who thought"Tony Romo also had that surgery" is not the ringing endorsement he seems to think it is.
Surtain or Slater. If not bail out and take Horn later.
Yeah, I want him and pitts gone by dallas pick. Sewell might drop into our laps and i couldn't complain, but other than that take best impact defender.Let's hope Surtain can keep his 40 under 4.5 tomorrow!
I like your style.Sewell
Parsons
Moehrig
If none of these there, we wheelin & dealn.
Have it lined up by the 8th pick to highest bidder.
With Farley off the board I'm fine with just taking the safe player in Moehrig. Forget who mentioned it earlier but it's like Frederick, fuck the critics.Sewell
Parsons
Moehrig
If none of these there, we wheelin & dealn.
Have it lined up by the 8th pick to highest bidder.
I would compare it more to Greg Ellis because it's a top ten pick. Frederick was like 31 or whatever, which to me changes how I look at it a bit.With Farley off the board I'm fine with just taking the safe player in Moehrig. Forget who mentioned it earlier but it's like Frederick, fuck the critics.
What up.With Farley off the board I'm fine with just taking the safe player in Moehrig. Forget who mentioned it earlier but it's like Frederick, fuck the critics.
The point is that I think most of the board would be thrilled with moving down to say 17, picking up a 3 and taking Moehrig, so why not at 10?I would compare it more to Greg Ellis because it's a top ten pick. Frederick was like 31 or whatever, which to me changes how I look at it a bit.
I definitely agree with fuck the critics.
The point is that I think most of the board would be thrilled with moving down to say 17, picking up a 3 and taking Moehrig, so why not at 10?
It's not ideal obviously but I'd be fine with it.
Would definitely rather take Slater though.
Yeah it's just hard to say if Moehrig will last to 17. If he doesn't you have to be ready to draft someone like Horn or Barmore which I'm ok with.Because Moehrig is not equal to Moehrig plus a 3rd.
There will be better players available at 10. Slater for example.
Also true. These guys won't value a FS like they should.I don't think they'll take Moehrig whether they trade down or not.
I don't think so either. Much less so of they sign either Hooker or KazeeI don't think they'll take Moehrig whether they trade down or not.
Which is stupid. In no way should a 1 year deal impact what you do in the draft.I don't think so either. Much less so of they sign either Hooker or Kazee
I agree but I don't think they will see it that way.Which is stupid. In no way should a 1 year deal impact what you do in the draft.
Oh I know. Shit Kazee is a fringe roster guy.I agree but I don't think they will see it that way.