- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 27,202
You know, if he wasn't such an ass about it I wouldn't care. But Beverley has made it a point to rub it in the faces of the OKC players and fans.Yea, I thought you'd get a kick out of the torn meniscus thing.
You know, if he wasn't such an ass about it I wouldn't care. But Beverley has made it a point to rub it in the faces of the OKC players and fans.Yea, I thought you'd get a kick out of the torn meniscus thing.
Would've been hilarious had they given up real pieces for O'Niel like he alludes to. That dude broke down the next year.
HanksWestbrook's Subway commercial is greatness...he looks and sounds retarded.
Are you flateasing me?Hanks
De Niro
Nicholson
Westbrook
D. Washington
in that order.
As an aside, I love the Southern Comfort commercial with the old black man dancing in the yellow shirt. That is true greatness. You can tell he was feeling it. The Comfort had a hold of him and he was feeling nice. I've been there.
Like I said a while back, the Bulls can give them a series, but I can't really see them winning it since the Pacers have the best player on the court in George and homecourt. We could take them 6, maybe even 7, but I would be surprised if we beat them.If Indiana doesn't get it together and play better these next two weeks I don't think they'll make it to the ECF. I could see Toronto or Chicago knocking them off in the 2nd round.
Chicago in particular. Chicago's achilles heel is their offense lacks consistency. Well the Pacers have been struggling on offense as well since the All Star break. That would play right into Chicago's hands. I could see them locked up in a series where the average scores are in the mid 80s and in that scenario I favor Chicago.
The only way I see the Thunder beating the Heat is if they take care of the ball and move it around smartly like they've shown they can do from time to time. The problem is they don't do those two things consistently. The only time that I can recall them playing under control and moving the ball smartly over a multiple game stretch was the 2012 series against the Spurs. That year they pretty much beat the Spurs at their own game.The Thunder seem to match up well with the Spurs for whatever reason, I think alot of it is because Westbrook makes Parker work so hard on the defensive end and saps his enery on the offensive end. On the other hand I don't think the Thunder match up well with the Heat while the Spurs do.
If it's Spurs/Heat, I expect a Spurs win, Thunder/Heat, I don't think it even goes 7 with Miami winning.
Yea they might want to consider just starting Ibaka at center and going small ball against Miami, the key will be Westbrook and if he can keep his composure and not do all sorts of dumb shit. The other thing is most of OKC's offense just seems to be predicated on getting the ball up the floor quick, using their athleticism and getting off quick shots, that won't work against Miami and if anything it would likely work against them as it could spark Miami's break.The only way I see the Thunder beating the Heat is if they take care of the ball and move it around smartly like they've shown they can do from time to time. The problem is they don't do those two things consistently. The only time that I can recall them playing under control and moving the ball smartly over a multiple game stretch was the 2012 series against the Spurs. That year they pretty much beat the Spurs at their own game.
Also, it would be helpful if Scott Brooks stopped playing Kendrick Perkins against the Heat. It's been proven as FACT that Perk is completely worthless against the Heat. It's no longer a theory, it's proven FACT.
It's as if Brooks enjoys watching his team fall behind by 10 early to the Heat because that's what always happens when Perkins starts against Miami.